Comparison Overview

Museum of South Texas History

VS

The Auckland Project

Museum of South Texas History

200 N Closner Blvd, Edinburg, Texas, 78541, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://MOSTHistory.org

Welcome to the official LinkedIn page of the Museum of South Texas History … a place with a history like no other! The Museum of South Texas History is accredited by the American Alliance of Museums. It is located in downtown Edinburg at 200 North Closner Boulevard on the Hidalgo County Courthouse square. Hours of operation are from 1-5 p.m. Sunday and 10 a.m.-5 p.m. Tuesday-Saturday. Founded in 1967 as the Hidalgo County Historical Museum in the 1910 Hidalgo County Jail, the museum has grown over the decades through a series of expansions to occupy a full city block. In 2003 following the completion of a 22,500 square foot expansion, the museum was renamed the Museum of South Texas History to better reflect its regional scope. Today, the museum preserves and presents the borderland heritage of South Texas and Northeastern Mexico through its permanent collection and the Margaret H. McAllen Memorial Archives and exhibits spanning prehistory through the 20th century. For more information about MOSTHistory, including becoming a FRIEND, visit MOSTHistory.org, like us on Facebook, follow on Twitter, connect on LinkedIn, find on Google+ or call +1-956-383-6911. STAY CONNECTED #MOSTHistory www.facebook.com/MOSTHistory www.twitter.com/MOSTHistory https://plus.google.com/+MOSTHistoryOrg https://www.youtube.com/c/MOSTHistoryOrg

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Auckland Project

Market Place, Bishop Auckland, County Durham, DL14 7NR, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aucklandproject.org

The Auckland Project was established by Jonathan Ruffer with an ambitious vision: to transform a 900-year-old bishop’s palace from an unknown private dwelling into a world-class art, faith and heritage destination of international significance. The desire to reinvigorate the town of Bishop Auckland and the wider region through social and economic regeneration is at the heart of this plan. Within five years this project should attract over 200,000 visitors and inject £4 million per year into Bishop Auckland and the surrounding area. When this plan is realised it will give the people of County Durham new opportunities through employment, volunteering and participation, and stimulate opportunities for local enterprise. Work is already underway on several of the ground-breaking developments, both at Auckland Castle itself and around Bishop Auckland’s Market Place. This will continue over the next two years to bring the vision to life and reinvigorate the local community through art and heritage projects. Sign up to our e-newsletter here: http://bit.ly/2ehQqIU

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-south-texas-history.jpeg
Museum of South Texas History
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/auckland-castle.jpeg
The Auckland Project
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of South Texas History
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Auckland Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of South Texas History in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Auckland Project in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of South Texas History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of South Texas History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Auckland Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Auckland Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-south-texas-history.jpeg
Museum of South Texas History
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/auckland-castle.jpeg
The Auckland Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Museum of South Texas History company and The Auckland Project company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Auckland Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of South Texas History company.

In the current year, The Auckland Project company and Museum of South Texas History company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Auckland Project company nor Museum of South Texas History company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Auckland Project company nor Museum of South Texas History company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Auckland Project company nor Museum of South Texas History company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of South Texas History company nor The Auckland Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of South Texas History nor The Auckland Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of South Texas History company nor The Auckland Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Auckland Project company employs more people globally than Museum of South Texas History company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of South Texas History nor The Auckland Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of South Texas History nor The Auckland Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of South Texas History nor The Auckland Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of South Texas History nor The Auckland Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of South Texas History nor The Auckland Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of South Texas History nor The Auckland Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References