Comparison Overview

Museum of Sex

VS

Swope Art Museum

Museum of Sex

233 Fifth Ave, NYC, New York, 10016, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Mission of the Museum of Sex is to preserve and present the history, evolution and cultural significance of human sexuality. The Museum produces exhibitions, publications and programs that bring the best of current scholarship to the widest possible audiences and is committed to encouraging public enlightenment, discourse and engagement.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Swope Art Museum

25 South 7th Street, Terre Haute, Indiana, 47807, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Small but significant, the Swope Art Museum is best known for its collection of works by great American artists such as Grant Wood, Thomas Hart Benton, Charles Burchfield, Zoltan Sepeshy and Edward Hopper. Founded through the forward-thinking efforts of local jewelry merchant and cultural connoisseur, Sheldon Swope (1843-1929), the Museum is dedicated to fulfilling its founder's wishes of providing his community, and all other comers, a place to explore the visual arts "...publicly and free of charge...forever," through exhibitions and educational opportunities.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-sex.jpeg
Museum of Sex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swope-art-museum.jpeg
Swope Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of Sex
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swope Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Sex in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swope Art Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Museum of Sex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Sex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swope Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swope Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-sex.jpeg
Museum of Sex
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swope-art-museum.jpeg
Swope Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Swope Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of Sex company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Swope Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of Sex company.

In the current year, Swope Art Museum company and Museum of Sex company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swope Art Museum company nor Museum of Sex company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Swope Art Museum company nor Museum of Sex company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Swope Art Museum company nor Museum of Sex company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of Sex company nor Swope Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Swope Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of Sex company nor Swope Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of Sex company employs more people globally than Swope Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Swope Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Swope Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Swope Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Swope Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Swope Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of Sex nor Swope Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X