Comparison Overview

MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts)

VS

The US Military Hall of Fame

MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts)

1000 Englewood Parkway #2-230, Englewood, CO, 80110, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Museum of Outdoor Arts (MOA) is a forerunner in the placement of site-specific sculpture in Colorado. MOA specializes in creating environments that promote a range of sculpture, as well as performance art. Our art collection is located within various public locations throughout the Denver metro area. From commercial office parks to botanic gardens, city parks and traditional sculpture gardens; art is placed to interpret space as "a museum without walls." Employing a combination of art, architecture, and landscape, MOA is best known for integrating these disciplines in order to create exemplary environments. Foremost, the Museum of Outdoor Arts believes in 'making art a part of everyday life' by integrating the arts into public spaces accessible by all. MOA is headquartered at Marjorie Park / Fiddler's Green Amphitheatre where it hosts a range of seasonal art events, programs and art installations. The park is also available to rent for private events.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The US Military Hall of Fame

None
Last Update: 2026-01-12

The United States Military Hall of Fame is a non-profit organization founded in August of 2011. It was founded for the sole purpose of preserving the honor, integrity, sacrifice, and accomplishments of those who have dedicated themselves to the United States of America. It is dedicated to showing the world the lengths that our military men and women will go to in order to protect our core belief, freedom. We here at the United States Military Hall of Fame are dedicated to making sure that every man, woman, and child know the names, faces, and stories of those who dedicate their lives to their fellow citizens, country, and brothers in arms. It is time for us, as American citizens, to do our duty, and let these men and women know their sacrifice is not in vain. It is time we show them that we will do our best to ease the pain of that sacrifice, to support them when they have not the strength to support themselves, to cheer for them in their victories, cry for them in their losses, but most of all it is up to us to make sure that our heroes know come what may, come what might, you will never be forgotten. For there is no greater enemy to a hero than that of time. We here at the United States Military Hall of Fame will show our troops our resolve in the fight against time, will you?

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-outdoor-arts.jpeg
MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-us-military-hall-of-fame.jpeg
The US Military Hall of Fame
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The US Military Hall of Fame
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The US Military Hall of Fame in 2026.

Incident History — MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The US Military Hall of Fame (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The US Military Hall of Fame cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-outdoor-arts.jpeg
MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-us-military-hall-of-fame.jpeg
The US Military Hall of Fame
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The US Military Hall of Fame company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The US Military Hall of Fame company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company.

In the current year, The US Military Hall of Fame company and MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The US Military Hall of Fame company nor MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The US Military Hall of Fame company nor MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The US Military Hall of Fame company nor MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company nor The US Military Hall of Fame company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) nor The US Military Hall of Fame holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company nor The US Military Hall of Fame company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) company employs more people globally than The US Military Hall of Fame company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) nor The US Military Hall of Fame holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) nor The US Military Hall of Fame holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) nor The US Military Hall of Fame holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) nor The US Military Hall of Fame holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) nor The US Military Hall of Fame holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MOA (Museum of Outdoor Arts) nor The US Military Hall of Fame holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N