Comparison Overview

Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa

VS

Aerospace Bristol

Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa

55 Cable Street, Wellington, NZ
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tepapa.govt.nz

Te Papa is New Zealand’s national museum, renowned for being bicultural, scholarly, innovative, and fun. Our success is built on our relationships with and ability to represent our community. Our collections span five areas: Art, History, Pacific, Māori, and Natural Environment. Our exhibitions are interdisciplinary and interactive, and we have dynamic events and education programmes. We also have thriving commercial enterprises, including a publishing division, conference operations, and retail stores.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 437
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Aerospace Bristol

Hayes Way, Patchway, BS34 5BZ, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aerospacebristol.org

Aerospace Bristol is a new industrial heritage museum in Filton that inspires and entertains today's and future generations through the stories and achievements of Bristol’s aerospace industry - past, present and future. Open now, the museum's show-stopping centrepiece is Concorde Alpha Foxtrot. Designed, built and tested in Bristol, she was the last Concorde to be built and the last to fly. The new museum has been planned by the Bristol Aero Collection Trust and has significant support from BAE Systems, Airbus, Rolls-Royce, South Gloucestershire Council and the Heritage Lottery Fund.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-new-zealand-te-papa-tongarewa.jpeg
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bristol-aero-collection.jpeg
Aerospace Bristol
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aerospace Bristol
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aerospace Bristol in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aerospace Bristol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aerospace Bristol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-new-zealand-te-papa-tongarewa.jpeg
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bristol-aero-collection.jpeg
Aerospace Bristol
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aerospace Bristol company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aerospace Bristol company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company.

In the current year, Aerospace Bristol company and Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aerospace Bristol company nor Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aerospace Bristol company nor Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aerospace Bristol company nor Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company nor Aerospace Bristol company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa nor Aerospace Bristol holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company nor Aerospace Bristol company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa company employs more people globally than Aerospace Bristol company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa nor Aerospace Bristol holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa nor Aerospace Bristol holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa nor Aerospace Bristol holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa nor Aerospace Bristol holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa nor Aerospace Bristol holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa nor Aerospace Bristol holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References