Comparison Overview

Museum Of Neon Art

VS

Worcester Art Museum

Museum Of Neon Art

216 S Brand Blvd, Glendale, 91204, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1981, MONA illuminates the past, present, and future through permanent and rotating exhibitions of cutting-edge electric, kinetic, and light-based artworks and historic signage. MONA continues to be one of the longest artist-operated museums in the world. The museum exhibits work in its galleries in Glendale, California and showcases historic signage from the 1920s–1980s at Universal CityWalk while maintaining its archive of signage in its Pomona, California warehouse. All neon signs are created by skilled artists who bend glass over flame. MONA makes a human connection to science, history, and art, encouraging visitors to reexamine their built environment. The museum fosters dialogue and ignites the creativity of a new generation through hands-on neon classes. MONA’s team of preservationists, historians, and artists sparks curiosity through demonstrations, bus tours, and neighborhood-based walks. The museum has revived historic neon signage by assisting the relighting of over 100 significant signs across LA County and advocating for the preservation, study, and advancement of electric and kinetic art. MONA’s groundbreaking exhibitions have launched careers and inspired generations of artists.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Worcester Art Museum

55 Salisbury Street, Worcester, 01609, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Worcester Art Museum creates transformative programs and exhibitions, drawing on its exceptional collection of art. Dating from 3,000 BC to the present, these works provide the foundation for a focus on audience engagement, connecting visitors of all ages and abilities with inspiring art and demonstrating its enduring relevance to daily life. Creative initiatives— including pioneering collaborative programs with local schools, fresh approaches to exhibition design and in-gallery teaching, and a long history of studio class instruction—offer opportunities for diverse audiences to experience art and learn both from and with artists. Since its founding in 1896, the Worcester Art Museum has assembled a collection of 38,000 objects: from the ancient Near East and Asia, to European and American paintings and sculptures, and continuing with works by contemporary artists from around the world. WAM has a history of making large scale acquisitions, such as its Medieval Chapter House, the Worcester Hunt Mosaic, its 15th-century Spanish ceiling, and the Flemish Last Judgment tapestry. In 2013, the Museum acquired the John Woodman Higgins Armory Collection comprising two thousand arms and armor objects. It continues to commission and present new works, such as 2017’s installation of the interactive Reusable Universes and Organic Concept works by Shi Chieh Huang.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 194
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-neon-art.jpeg
Museum Of Neon Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/worcester-art-museum.jpeg
Worcester Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum Of Neon Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Worcester Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum Of Neon Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Worcester Art Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Museum Of Neon Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum Of Neon Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Worcester Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Worcester Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-neon-art.jpeg
Museum Of Neon Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/worcester-art-museum.jpeg
Worcester Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Worcester Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum Of Neon Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Worcester Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum Of Neon Art company.

In the current year, Worcester Art Museum company and Museum Of Neon Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Worcester Art Museum company nor Museum Of Neon Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Worcester Art Museum company nor Museum Of Neon Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Worcester Art Museum company nor Museum Of Neon Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum Of Neon Art company nor Worcester Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum Of Neon Art nor Worcester Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum Of Neon Art company nor Worcester Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Worcester Art Museum company employs more people globally than Museum Of Neon Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum Of Neon Art nor Worcester Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum Of Neon Art nor Worcester Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum Of Neon Art nor Worcester Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum Of Neon Art nor Worcester Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum Of Neon Art nor Worcester Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum Of Neon Art nor Worcester Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X