Comparison Overview

Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD)

VS

Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County

Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD)

55 Water St, Brooklyn, New York, 11201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mofad.org

MOFAD is a new kind of museum that brings the world of food to life with exhibits you can taste, touch, and smell. We inspire public curiosity about food, what it means, and how it connects with the world around us. Our goal to be the world’s premier food museum and a global educational resource that inspires generations of curious eaters of all ages and backgrounds. The museum currently operates MOFAD Lab, a 5,000-square-foot experimental space in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. Learn more at mofad.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County

900 Exposition Blvd, Los Angeles, California, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://nhm.org

The NHM has amassed one of the world’s most extensive and valuable collections of natural and cultural history — more than 35 million objects, some as old as 4.5 billion years. Its curatorial staff not only cares for those collections, but uses them for groundbreaking scientific and historic research. The Museum also curates new, immersive exhibitions that give visitors the opportunity to explore the “big picture” of our planet — specimens and objects, the stories behind them, and the increasing interrelatedness of the natural and cultural worlds. The Natural History Family of Museums is dedicated to seeking employees who have demonstrated experience and commitment working with a diverse community.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 494
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-food-and-drink.jpeg
Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhmla.jpeg
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-food-and-drink.jpeg
Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhmla.jpeg
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company.

In the current year, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company and Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company nor Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company nor Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company nor Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County company employs more people globally than Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) nor Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References