Comparison Overview

Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

VS

Ulrich Museum of Art

Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

465 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mfa.org

The MFA is open. Open to new ideas that broaden our perspectives. Open to every visitor, from the curious to the lifelong learner. Open to new possibilities discovered through art. Showcasing ancient artistry and modern masterpieces, local legends and global visionaries, our renowned collection of nearly 500,000 works tells the story of the human experience—a story that holds unique meaning for everyone. We welcome diverse perspectives, both within the artwork and among our visitors. Where many worldviews meet, new ways of seeing, thinking, and understanding emerge. The conversations we inspire bring people together—revealing connections, exploring differences, and creating a community where all belong.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 958
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ulrich Museum of Art

Wichita State University, Wichita, 67260-0046, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ulrich.wichita.edu

As the region’s source for modern and contemporary art, the Ulrich Museum of Art, located on the campus of Wichita State University in Wichita, Kansas, provides a unique opportunity to view our world through the eyes of the leading artists of today. The museum seeks to expand human experience through encounters with the art of our time by developing and presenting an endless stream of groundbreaking exhibitions, prominent guest artists, art parties, fun family events, and compelling performances that explore today’s visual culture.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-fine-arts-boston.jpeg
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ulrich-museum-of-art.jpeg
Ulrich Museum of Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ulrich Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Fine Arts, Boston in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ulrich Museum of Art in 2025.

Incident History — Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Fine Arts, Boston cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ulrich Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ulrich Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-fine-arts-boston.jpeg
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ulrich-museum-of-art.jpeg
Ulrich Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ulrich Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ulrich Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company.

In the current year, Ulrich Museum of Art company and Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art company nor Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art company nor Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ulrich Museum of Art company nor Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company nor Ulrich Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Ulrich Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company nor Ulrich Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company employs more people globally than Ulrich Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Ulrich Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Ulrich Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Ulrich Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Ulrich Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Ulrich Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Ulrich Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References