Comparison Overview

Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

VS

Fernbank Museum of Natural History

Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

465 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The MFA is open. Open to new ideas that broaden our perspectives. Open to every visitor, from the curious to the lifelong learner. Open to new possibilities discovered through art. Showcasing ancient artistry and modern masterpieces, local legends and global visionaries, our renowned collection of nearly 500,000 works tells the story of the human experience—a story that holds unique meaning for everyone. We welcome diverse perspectives, both within the artwork and among our visitors. Where many worldviews meet, new ways of seeing, thinking, and understanding emerge. The conversations we inspire bring people together—revealing connections, exploring differences, and creating a community where all belong.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 958
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fernbank Museum of Natural History

767 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30307, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Discover a world of wow at Atlanta’s science and nature experience. Come in, go out, and see what’s new as you explore 75 acres of the great outdoors, three levels of indoor science adventures, and 3D movies so amazing, they require a 4-story giant screen. Our Mission Fernbank’s mission is to ignite a passion for science, nature and human culture through exploration and discovery.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 116
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-fine-arts-boston.jpeg
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fernbank-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
Fernbank Museum of Natural History
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fernbank Museum of Natural History
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Fine Arts, Boston in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fernbank Museum of Natural History in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Fine Arts, Boston cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fernbank Museum of Natural History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fernbank Museum of Natural History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-fine-arts-boston.jpeg
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fernbank-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
Fernbank Museum of Natural History
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fernbank Museum of Natural History company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fernbank Museum of Natural History company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company.

In the current year, Fernbank Museum of Natural History company and Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fernbank Museum of Natural History company nor Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fernbank Museum of Natural History company nor Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fernbank Museum of Natural History company nor Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company nor Fernbank Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Fernbank Museum of Natural History holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company nor Fernbank Museum of Natural History company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of Fine Arts, Boston company employs more people globally than Fernbank Museum of Natural History company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Fernbank Museum of Natural History holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Fernbank Museum of Natural History holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Fernbank Museum of Natural History holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Fernbank Museum of Natural History holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Fernbank Museum of Natural History holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of Fine Arts, Boston nor Fernbank Museum of Natural History holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.