Comparison Overview

Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago

VS

Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia

Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago

200 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60611, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Museum of Contemporary Art (MCA) Chicago offers exhibitions of the most thought-provoking art created since 1945. The MCA documents contemporary visual culture through painting, sculpture, photography, video and film, and performance. Located in the heart of downtown Chicago, the MCA boasts a gift store, bookstore, restaurant, 300-seat theater, and a terraced sculpture garden with a great view of Lake Michigan.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 268
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia

Address Given with Tour Booking, Petaluma, CA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-03
Between 750 and 799

Officially recognized by Guinness World Records in 2014, Rancho Obi-Wan is a private nonprofit museum housing the world’s largest collection of Star Wars memorabilia. Rancho Obi-Wan's mission is to inspire kids and the kid in all of us. Has Star Wars transformed your life? You can spark imagination in the lives of others by joining us in our efforts. Even a small donation makes a difference! Your continued support funds: • the operation of the museum • the protection and documentation of the collection for future generations • free inspirational and educational tours for schools • donated tours to other charities for their fundraisers • traveling exhibits of specially curated objects Donate now because your combined resources can ignite even more dreams and creativity in this world. https://donate.ranchoobiwan.org

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-contemporary-art-chicago.jpeg
Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rancho-obi-wan.jpeg
Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-contemporary-art-chicago.jpeg
Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rancho-obi-wan.jpeg
Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago company.

In the current year, Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia company and Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia company nor Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia company nor Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia company nor Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago company nor Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago nor Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago company nor Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago company employs more people globally than Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago nor Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago nor Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago nor Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago nor Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago nor Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago nor Rancho Obi-Wan Museum of Star Wars Memorabilia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N