Comparison Overview

Museum of Broadcast Communications

VS

Ordrupgaard

Museum of Broadcast Communications

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

The Museum of Broadcast Communications (MBC) believes in the power of broadcasting and knows it has a powerful impact on society. So, we seek to explore and put into context the history as well as the future of radio, television and digital platforms. We are educators via our exhibits, curriculums, archives, public programs. MBC also owns and manages the National Radio Hall of Fame (NRHOF)

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ordrupgaard

Vilvordevej 110, Charlottenlund, Hovedstaden, DK, 2920
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Ordrupgaard er et museum for fransk impressionisme med kunstnere som Monet, Degas, Renoir og Gauguin. Dertil kommer en betydelig samling af dansk kunst koncentreret omkring Hammershøi og hans tid – samt skiftende særudstillinger. I parken finder du værker af internationale samtidskunstnere. Eller du kan besøge Finn Juhls verdensberømte hus. Bygninger af Zaha Hadid og Snøhetta understreger museets arkitektoniske profil og optræder som værker i deres egen ret. Ordrupgaard blev grundlagt af ægteparret Wilhelm og Henny Hansen som en privat kunstsamling. Museet holder fortsat til i stifterparrets herskabshjem, Ordrupgaard, der blev opført i 1918.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-broadcast-communications.jpeg
Museum of Broadcast Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ordrupgaard.jpeg
Ordrupgaard
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of Broadcast Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ordrupgaard
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Broadcast Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ordrupgaard in 2025.

Incident History — Museum of Broadcast Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Broadcast Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ordrupgaard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ordrupgaard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-broadcast-communications.jpeg
Museum of Broadcast Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ordrupgaard.jpeg
Ordrupgaard
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Museum of Broadcast Communications company and Ordrupgaard company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Ordrupgaard company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of Broadcast Communications company.

In the current year, Ordrupgaard company and Museum of Broadcast Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ordrupgaard company nor Museum of Broadcast Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ordrupgaard company nor Museum of Broadcast Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ordrupgaard company nor Museum of Broadcast Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of Broadcast Communications company nor Ordrupgaard company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of Broadcast Communications nor Ordrupgaard holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of Broadcast Communications company nor Ordrupgaard company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ordrupgaard company employs more people globally than Museum of Broadcast Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of Broadcast Communications nor Ordrupgaard holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of Broadcast Communications nor Ordrupgaard holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of Broadcast Communications nor Ordrupgaard holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of Broadcast Communications nor Ordrupgaard holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of Broadcast Communications nor Ordrupgaard holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of Broadcast Communications nor Ordrupgaard holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X