Comparison Overview

Museum of African American History

VS

Field Museum

Museum of African American History

31 Milk St., Boston, Massachusetts, 02109, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1967, the principal mission of the Museum of African American History is to preserve, conserve and interpret the contributions of people of African descent and those who have found common cause with them in the struggle for liberty, dignity, and justice for all Americans. Therefore the Museum: - Collects and exhibits artifacts of distinction and acquires and maintains physical structures and sites dating through the end of the 19th century; - Educates the public about the importance of the African American historical legacy in general, and its Boston and New England heritages in particular; - Celebrates the enduring vitality of African American culture; and - Advances on our own and in collaboration with others an appreciation of the lessons of the past to benefit the custodians of the future.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Field Museum

1400 S Lakeshore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60605, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Now in its 125th year, the Field Museum is a forward-thinking scientific leader on a mission to explore, protect, and celebrate nature and culture. The Field takes part in groundbreaking research all over the world while maintaining one of the world’s largest collections of artifacts and specimens, used to inspire discovery, spark public engagement with science, and uncover solutions for a better world. To share its scientific and educational mission, the Field welcomes 1.6 million visitors every year.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 842
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-african-american-history.jpeg
Museum of African American History
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-field-museum.jpeg
Field Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of African American History
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Field Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of African American History in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Field Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of African American History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of African American History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Field Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Field Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-african-american-history.jpeg
Museum of African American History
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-field-museum.jpeg
Field Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Field Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of African American History company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Field Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of African American History company.

In the current year, Field Museum company and Museum of African American History company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Field Museum company nor Museum of African American History company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Field Museum company nor Museum of African American History company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Field Museum company nor Museum of African American History company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of African American History company nor Field Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of African American History nor Field Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of African American History company nor Field Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Field Museum company employs more people globally than Museum of African American History company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of African American History nor Field Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of African American History nor Field Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of African American History nor Field Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of African American History nor Field Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of African American History nor Field Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of African American History nor Field Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H