Comparison Overview

Museo de Antioquia

VS

Residencia de Estudiantes

Museo de Antioquia

Carrera 52 N. 52-43, Medellín, 00000, CO
Last Update: 2026-01-22

El Museo de Antioquia es el museo más importante de Medellín, y uno de los más conocidos de Colombia. Fue el primero fundado en el departamento de Antioquia, el segundo en el país. Sus colecciones reposan en pleno centro de Medellín, frente a la plaza Botero, cerca de la Estación Parque Berrío del metro. El Museo de Antioquia, es reconocido por ser la casa de la Donación Botero, Maestro Fernando Botero, aunque posee otras obras, de incalculable valor histórico y artístico.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Residencia de Estudiantes

Calle del Pinar, 21, Madrid, 28006, ES
Last Update: 2026-01-16

La Residencia de Estudiantes es en la actualidad una fundación, creada por el Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), de cuyo Patronato forman parte, además del CSIC, el Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación, el Ministerio de Industria, Turismo y Comercio, el Ministerio de Cultura, el Consejo Superior de Deportes y la Comunidad de Madrid, entre otros. Desde su fundación en 1910 por la Junta para Ampliación de Estudios hasta 1936, fue el primer centro cultural de España y una de las experiencias más vivas y fructíferas de creación e intercambio científico y artístico de la Europa de entreguerras. Durante esta primera etapa su director fue Alberto Jiménez Fraud, que hizo de ella una casa abierta a la creación, el pensamiento y el diálogo interdisciplinar. Tanto la Junta como la Residencia eran producto de las ideas renovadoras de la Institución Libre de Enseñanza, fundada en 1876 por Francisco Giner de los Ríos. La Residencia se proponía complementar la enseñanza universitaria mediante la creación de un ambiente intelectual y de convivencia adecuado a los estudiantes. Ello hizo de la misma un foco de difusión de la modernidad en España, y de entre los residentes surgieron muchas de las figuras más destacadas de la cultura española del siglo XX, como el poeta Federico García Lorca, el pintor Salvador Dalí, el cineasta Luis Buñuel y el científico Severo Ochoa. A ella acudían como visitantes asiduos o como residentes durante sus estancias en Madrid Miguel de Unamuno, Alfonso Reyes, Manuel de Falla, Juan Ramón Jiménez, José Ortega y Gasset o Rafael Alberti, entre muchos otros. Fue además foro de debate y difusión de la vida intelectual de la Europa de entreguerras, presentada directamente por sus protagonistas. Entre las personalidades que acudieron a sus salones figuran Albert Einstein, Paul Valéry, Marie Curie, Igor Stravinsky y Le Corbusier. Hoy en día es uno de los centros más originales del panorama cultural español.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 307
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museo-de-antioquia.jpeg
Museo de Antioquia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/residencia-de-estudiantes.jpeg
Residencia de Estudiantes
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museo de Antioquia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Residencia de Estudiantes
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museo de Antioquia in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Residencia de Estudiantes in 2026.

Incident History — Museo de Antioquia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museo de Antioquia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Residencia de Estudiantes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Residencia de Estudiantes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museo-de-antioquia.jpeg
Museo de Antioquia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/residencia-de-estudiantes.jpeg
Residencia de Estudiantes
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Residencia de Estudiantes company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museo de Antioquia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Residencia de Estudiantes company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museo de Antioquia company.

In the current year, Residencia de Estudiantes company and Museo de Antioquia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Residencia de Estudiantes company nor Museo de Antioquia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Residencia de Estudiantes company nor Museo de Antioquia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Residencia de Estudiantes company nor Museo de Antioquia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museo de Antioquia company nor Residencia de Estudiantes company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor Residencia de Estudiantes holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museo de Antioquia company nor Residencia de Estudiantes company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Residencia de Estudiantes company employs more people globally than Museo de Antioquia company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor Residencia de Estudiantes holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor Residencia de Estudiantes holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor Residencia de Estudiantes holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor Residencia de Estudiantes holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor Residencia de Estudiantes holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor Residencia de Estudiantes holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N