Comparison Overview

Museo de Antioquia

VS

New Orleans Museum of Art

Museo de Antioquia

Carrera 52 N. 52-43, Medellín, 00000, CO
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.museodeantioquia.org.co

El Museo de Antioquia es el museo más importante de Medellín, y uno de los más conocidos de Colombia. Fue el primero fundado en el departamento de Antioquia, el segundo en el país. Sus colecciones reposan en pleno centro de Medellín, frente a la plaza Botero, cerca de la Estación Parque Berrío del metro. El Museo de Antioquia, es reconocido por ser la casa de la Donación Botero, Maestro Fernando Botero, aunque posee otras obras, de incalculable valor histórico y artístico.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

New Orleans Museum of Art

1 Collins Diboll Circle, City Park, New Orleans, LA, US, 70179
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.noma.org

New Orleans Museum of Art (NOMA), New Orleans’ oldest fine arts institution, opened on December 16, 1911 with only 9 works of art. Today, the museum hosts an impressive permanent collection of almost 40,000 objects. The collection, noted for its extraordinary strengths in French and American art, photography, glass, and African and Japanese works, continues to expand and grow, making NOMA one of the top art museums in the south. The five-acre Sydney and Walda Besthoff Sculpture Garden at NOMA is one of the most important sculpture installations in the United States, with over 60 sculptures situated on a beautifully landscaped site amongst meandering footpaths, reflecting lagoons, Spanish moss-laden 200-year-old live oaks, mature pines, magnolias, camellias, and pedestrian bridges.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museo-de-antioquia.jpeg
Museo de Antioquia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-orleans-museum-of-art.jpeg
New Orleans Museum of Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museo de Antioquia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New Orleans Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museo de Antioquia in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Orleans Museum of Art in 2025.

Incident History — Museo de Antioquia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museo de Antioquia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New Orleans Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Orleans Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museo-de-antioquia.jpeg
Museo de Antioquia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-orleans-museum-of-art.jpeg
New Orleans Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Museo de Antioquia company and New Orleans Museum of Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, New Orleans Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museo de Antioquia company.

In the current year, New Orleans Museum of Art company and Museo de Antioquia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New Orleans Museum of Art company nor Museo de Antioquia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither New Orleans Museum of Art company nor Museo de Antioquia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither New Orleans Museum of Art company nor Museo de Antioquia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museo de Antioquia company nor New Orleans Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor New Orleans Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museo de Antioquia company nor New Orleans Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museo de Antioquia company employs more people globally than New Orleans Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor New Orleans Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor New Orleans Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor New Orleans Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor New Orleans Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor New Orleans Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museo de Antioquia nor New Orleans Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References