Comparison Overview

Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal

VS

CODART

Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal

Place Ville Marie, Montréal, Québec, H3B 2E7, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.macm.org

Première institution au Canada vouée exclusivement à l'art contemporain, le Musée offre une programmation variée comportant la présentation de sa Collection permanente et des expositions temporaires d'œuvres d'artistes québécois, canadiens et internationaux. *** A major Canadian institution dedicated exclusively to contemporary art, the Musée offers a varied program ranging from presentations of its Permanent Collection to exhibitions of works by Québec, Canadian and international artists.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 113
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CODART

Koninginnegracht 15, The Hague, 2514 AB, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://www.codart.nl

CODART is the international network of curators of Dutch and Flemish art. The tremendous popularity and the fact that works of art from the Low Countries of the fifteenth through the nineteenth century are widely disseminated means that CODART’s network is extensive and unique. Major holdings of Dutch and Flemish fine and decorative art are located in approximately 50 countries. Most of these collections – assembled by royals and individuals passionate about Dutch and Flemish art – are currently held in public museums. CODART aims to make this widespread cultural heritage more visible and accessible to an international public. At the same time, the organization aims to increase public knowledge of Dutch and Flemish art, thereby lending a historical phenomenon a contemporary dimension.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mus-e-d'art-contemporain-de-montr-al.jpeg
Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/codart.jpeg
CODART
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CODART
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CODART in 2026.

Incident History — Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CODART (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CODART cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mus-e-d'art-contemporain-de-montr-al.jpeg
Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/codart.jpeg
CODART
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CODART company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CODART company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal company.

In the current year, CODART company and Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CODART company nor Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CODART company nor Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CODART company nor Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal company nor CODART company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal nor CODART holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal company nor CODART company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal company employs more people globally than CODART company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal nor CODART holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal nor CODART holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal nor CODART holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal nor CODART holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal nor CODART holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Musée d'art contemporain de Montréal nor CODART holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References