Comparison Overview

Murdoch Lawyers

VS

Jordan IP Law, LLC

Murdoch Lawyers

138 Margaret Street, Toowoomba, 4350, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At Murdoch Lawyers, our intent is to provide premium legal services within a timeframe that is reasonable and at a price which delivers value. To ensure that we achieve this, we consider: Are we the right lawyer? At the outset we make sure that we are able to provide the legal service required. Sometimes we may not be the firm best suited to a client’s particular needs. If this is the case, we seek to refer to other lawyers or experts who we believe could assist. What is important? At Murdoch Lawyers, we want to understand what is important to our clients and we will discuss this during the first appointment. We are particularly interested in expectations of our service. How do we handle referrals? The majority of our new clients find us through referrals from existing clients. As a result, we ensure our clients are aware of how we manage people who are referred to us and the types of matters we are best placed to handle. If you are happy with the service that we provide, we would encourage you to refer any friends or colleagues to us.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jordan IP Law, LLC

1701 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20006, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At Jordan IP Law, LLC, we help to extend the growth of your business by providing large firm patent experience with unprecedented personal attention at a value that meets your bottom line. In particular, we provide the full spectrum of IP-related legal services, with a particular emphasis on high quality, low overhead patent counseling and prosecution in the electrical, computer, software and mechanical arts.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/murdoch-lawyers.jpeg
Murdoch Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jordan-ip-law-pc.jpeg
Jordan IP Law, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Murdoch Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jordan IP Law, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Murdoch Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jordan IP Law, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Murdoch Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Murdoch Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jordan IP Law, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jordan IP Law, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/murdoch-lawyers.jpeg
Murdoch Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jordan-ip-law-pc.jpeg
Jordan IP Law, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Murdoch Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jordan IP Law, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jordan IP Law, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Murdoch Lawyers company.

In the current year, Jordan IP Law, LLC company and Murdoch Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jordan IP Law, LLC company nor Murdoch Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jordan IP Law, LLC company nor Murdoch Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jordan IP Law, LLC company nor Murdoch Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Murdoch Lawyers company nor Jordan IP Law, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Murdoch Lawyers nor Jordan IP Law, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Murdoch Lawyers company nor Jordan IP Law, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Murdoch Lawyers company employs more people globally than Jordan IP Law, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Murdoch Lawyers nor Jordan IP Law, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Murdoch Lawyers nor Jordan IP Law, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Murdoch Lawyers nor Jordan IP Law, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Murdoch Lawyers nor Jordan IP Law, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Murdoch Lawyers nor Jordan IP Law, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Murdoch Lawyers nor Jordan IP Law, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X