Comparison Overview

Murdoch Books

VS

SAP PRESS

Murdoch Books

83 Alexander Street, Crows Nest, 2037, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Murdoch Books is a division of Allen & Unwin, Australia’s largest independent book publisher. Originally established by Murdoch Magazines in the early 1990s, Murdoch Books was acquired by Allen & Unwin in 2012 in a perfect match of independent spirit and industry-leading flair and expertise in lifestyle publishing. We publish books for ‘living life well’ across a broad range of categories, encompassing food, health and wellbeing, personal transformation and self-help, home and family, and sustainable living. Headquartered in Sydney, Australia, we have offices in Auckland and London and an extensive network of international partners across more than 20 languages.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SAP PRESS

2 Heritage Drive, Quincy, MA, 02171, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

SAP PRESS is the leading book and e-book publisher of technical and business-related topics for the SAP community. Our quality titles enable better decision making and improve the effectiveness of varied and complex SAP projects. SAP PRESS authors are respected programmers, developers, business leaders, and SAP mentors. Each is chosen with great care within the framework of our high quality standards. In close cooperation, we deliver well-written titles for a community in need of reliable information. SAP PRESS is a joint initiative of SAP and Rheinwerk Publishing.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/murdoch-books.jpeg
Murdoch Books
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sap-press.jpeg
SAP PRESS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Murdoch Books
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SAP PRESS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Murdoch Books in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAP PRESS in 2025.

Incident History — Murdoch Books (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Murdoch Books cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SAP PRESS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAP PRESS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/murdoch-books.jpeg
Murdoch Books
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sap-press.jpeg
SAP PRESS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SAP PRESS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Murdoch Books company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SAP PRESS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Murdoch Books company.

In the current year, SAP PRESS company and Murdoch Books company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SAP PRESS company nor Murdoch Books company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SAP PRESS company nor Murdoch Books company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SAP PRESS company nor Murdoch Books company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Murdoch Books company nor SAP PRESS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Murdoch Books nor SAP PRESS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SAP PRESS company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Murdoch Books company.

SAP PRESS company employs more people globally than Murdoch Books company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Murdoch Books nor SAP PRESS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Murdoch Books nor SAP PRESS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Murdoch Books nor SAP PRESS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Murdoch Books nor SAP PRESS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Murdoch Books nor SAP PRESS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Murdoch Books nor SAP PRESS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.