Comparison Overview

Muratek

VS

Open Mesh - a Datto Company

Muratek

75 Maiden Ln., New York, NY, 10038, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://muratek.com

Headquartered in Lower Manhattan, Muratek is the embodiment of a virtual IT department. Our aggressive philosophy combined with our rock-solid service make us your best option. The days of high-priced technology directors and underutilization of corporate assets is over. Muratek takes on the role of your entire IT department. Our consultants make executive level decisions in cornerstone business all over the city. Our technicians are deployed to dozens of businesses each and every day. And the benefits are obvious: There are no housing or payroll fees, no benefits or leave time. The choice is yours, but does hiring a 6-figure IT staff make sense when Muratek's corporate rates are the most competitive in the industry?

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Open Mesh - a Datto Company

111 SW 5th Ave., Portland, 97204, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749
http://www.openmesh.com

Open Mesh is about smarter, simpler networks. Our low-cost, cloud-managed wireless mesh networks make it easy to build a professional network just about anywhere. Fueled by the passion and success of our customers, Open Mesh has become a leader in low cost, enterprise-grade cloud-managed WiFi with more than 115,000 networks in use today. We specialize in hotels and resorts, multi-family complexes, retail stores, restaurants and small and medium-sized businesses. With free cloud management, we’re a favorite of managed service providers and integrators. And with an open API and customizable firmware platform, we’re developer-friendly too.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muratek.jpeg
Muratek
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/open-mesh.jpeg
Open Mesh - a Datto Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Muratek
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Open Mesh - a Datto Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Muratek in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Open Mesh - a Datto Company in 2025.

Incident History — Muratek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Muratek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Open Mesh - a Datto Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Open Mesh - a Datto Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muratek.jpeg
Muratek
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/open-mesh.jpeg
Open Mesh - a Datto Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Muratek company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Open Mesh - a Datto Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Open Mesh - a Datto Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Muratek company.

In the current year, Open Mesh - a Datto Company company and Muratek company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Open Mesh - a Datto Company company nor Muratek company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Open Mesh - a Datto Company company nor Muratek company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Open Mesh - a Datto Company company nor Muratek company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Muratek company nor Open Mesh - a Datto Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Muratek nor Open Mesh - a Datto Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Muratek company nor Open Mesh - a Datto Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Muratek company employs more people globally than Open Mesh - a Datto Company company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Muratek nor Open Mesh - a Datto Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Muratek nor Open Mesh - a Datto Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Muratek nor Open Mesh - a Datto Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Muratek nor Open Mesh - a Datto Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Muratek nor Open Mesh - a Datto Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Muratek nor Open Mesh - a Datto Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References