Comparison Overview

Muntpunt

VS

Gloucester County Library System

Muntpunt

Munt 6, Brussel, 1000, BE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Muntpunt is a reading and learning hub for curious minds. It’s an information point for anyone who wants to live, work, study, or enjoy life in Brussels. A second home for those who want to relax in peace or meet new people. For those who want to surf the web or take shelter, even in good weather. And for anyone looking for a story or wanting to tell one — even to us. Welcome!

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 80
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gloucester County Library System

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Gloucester County Library System (GCLS) is a group of individual and interdependent libraries that cooperate through a central administrative body to provide a wide range of library services for eligible patrons. Sharing resources enables members of the system to provide more cost-effective and technologically sophisticated services than any could provide operating alone. The GCLS staff is responsible to a seven-member library commission, which is appointed by the Gloucester County Board of Chosen Freeholders. Funds for system services are provided by the member municipalities through a dedicated library tax.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muntpunt.jpeg
Muntpunt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gloucester-county-library-system.jpeg
Gloucester County Library System
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Muntpunt
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gloucester County Library System
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Muntpunt in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gloucester County Library System in 2025.

Incident History — Muntpunt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Muntpunt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gloucester County Library System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gloucester County Library System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muntpunt.jpeg
Muntpunt
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gloucester-county-library-system.jpeg
Gloucester County Library System
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gloucester County Library System company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Muntpunt company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gloucester County Library System company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Muntpunt company.

In the current year, Gloucester County Library System company and Muntpunt company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gloucester County Library System company nor Muntpunt company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gloucester County Library System company nor Muntpunt company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gloucester County Library System company nor Muntpunt company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Muntpunt company nor Gloucester County Library System company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Muntpunt nor Gloucester County Library System holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Muntpunt company nor Gloucester County Library System company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Muntpunt company employs more people globally than Gloucester County Library System company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Muntpunt nor Gloucester County Library System holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Muntpunt nor Gloucester County Library System holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Muntpunt nor Gloucester County Library System holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Muntpunt nor Gloucester County Library System holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Muntpunt nor Gloucester County Library System holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Muntpunt nor Gloucester County Library System holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H