Comparison Overview

Municipalidad de San Francisco

VS

Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc.

Municipalidad de San Francisco

2400, AR
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Página informativa sobre los acontecimientos actuales realizados desde la Municipalidad en la ciudadanía e información sobre las diferentes areas involucradas en la gestión con sus respectivas funciones y noticias que involucren a las mismas y tengan impacto sobre los habitantes, como así también datos sobre empresas locales y plano de la ciudad. Permite a los ciudadanos realizar diferentes consultas y reclamos, a través de mensajes de texto, dirigidos al area correspondiente.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 690
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc.

CA
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Welcome to the Ontario section of Flowers Canada Growers (FCG). Ontario greenhouse growers are known for their leading edge technology that is utilized to produce hundreds of varieties of floriculture products for consumers throughout North America. There are almost 250 floriculture greenhouse growers in Ontario whose operations have over 20,000 sq ft of greenhouse space. Growers in excess of 20,000 sq ft, are mandated by the Ontario Farm Products Marketing Act to be members of Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. (FCO) In Ontario. Flowers Canada Growers works in conjunction with Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc., a not for profit organization to care for the provincial and federal issues facing Ontario floriculture producers. The Ontario floriculture industry: 54.5%, of the total floriculture sector in Canada 784.8 million in sales each year 2.88 billion estimated total economic impact Ontario growers have launched an exciting new marketing campaign to encourage consumers to purchase locally grown quality flowers. Visit www.pickontario.ca for more details.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Municipalidad de San Francisco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Municipalidad de San Francisco
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Municipalidad de San Francisco in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Municipalidad de San Francisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Municipalidad de San Francisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Municipalidad de San Francisco
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Municipalidad de San Francisco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Municipalidad de San Francisco company.

In the current year, Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. company and Municipalidad de San Francisco company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. company nor Municipalidad de San Francisco company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. company nor Municipalidad de San Francisco company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. company nor Municipalidad de San Francisco company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Municipalidad de San Francisco company nor Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Municipalidad de San Francisco nor Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Municipalidad de San Francisco company nor Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Municipalidad de San Francisco company employs more people globally than Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Municipalidad de San Francisco nor Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Municipalidad de San Francisco nor Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Municipalidad de San Francisco nor Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Municipalidad de San Francisco nor Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Municipalidad de San Francisco nor Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Municipalidad de San Francisco nor Flowers Canada (Ontario) Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N