Comparison Overview

Multilaw

VS

Suffolk Legal

Multilaw

125 Wood Street, London, EC2V 7AW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Working globally means crossing not only geographical borders, but also legal, linguistic and cultural borders. In an ever-more complex world, a leap of faith is not enough: you need trust. Multilaw is an international network of law firms providing the highest standards of advice and service, collaborating across borders and putting an end to distance. Every one of our firms is independent and proud of the local character and insight they bring to the table. It is this on-the-ground knowledge that helps clients take on the world.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Suffolk Legal

Constantine House, Ipswich, IP1 2DH, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are a local authority, in-house legal service based in Ipswich specialising in local government law, providing services to a range of public sector organisations across the Eastern region and beyond. We are nationally recognised for excellence by the Law Society for training and developing our staff as well as the current Lawyers in Local Government In-House Team of the Year. As a Lexcel and ISO 9001 accredited practice we focus on what our customers need so our services are designed to consistently deliver on those high expectations at an affordable price.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/multilaw.jpeg
Multilaw
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Multilaw
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Suffolk Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Multilaw in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Suffolk Legal in 2025.

Incident History — Multilaw (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Multilaw cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Suffolk Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Suffolk Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/multilaw.jpeg
Multilaw
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suffolk-legal-.jpeg
Suffolk Legal
Incidents

FAQ

Suffolk Legal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Multilaw company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Suffolk Legal company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Multilaw company has not reported any.

In the current year, Suffolk Legal company has reported more cyber incidents than Multilaw company.

Suffolk Legal company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Multilaw company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Suffolk Legal company nor Multilaw company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Suffolk Legal company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Multilaw company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Multilaw company nor Suffolk Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Multilaw nor Suffolk Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Suffolk Legal company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Multilaw company.

Neither Multilaw nor Suffolk Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Multilaw nor Suffolk Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Multilaw nor Suffolk Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Multilaw nor Suffolk Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Multilaw nor Suffolk Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Multilaw nor Suffolk Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X