Comparison Overview

Multi Choice Cash

VS

Eldorado Resorts, Inc.

Multi Choice Cash

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Multi Choice Cash is the Gaming division of ATMMS. We are a privately held Las Vegas based company specializing in providing custom cash access solutions to the casino industry. We have a footprint in 39 states and have enjoyed consective growth in profit and revenue for 14 years. Our corporate structure and integrated technologies allow us to provide high technology solutions at a very low cost. In addition we have created a service program called "Account Life Cycle Management." This program creates a detailed service plan from install to day to day management of account issues.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Eldorado Resorts, Inc.

100 West Liberty Street, Reno, Nevada, 89501, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Caesars Entertainment joins two successful gaming leaders, Caesars Entertainment and Eldorado Resorts, who have come together to create the largest and most diversified collection of destinations across the U.S. Boasting many of the world’s most prestigious gaming brands, including Caesars Palace®, Harrah’s®, Horseshoe®, Eldorado®, Silver Legacy®, Circus Circus® Reno and Tropicana®, among many others, we are the global leader in gaming and hospitality. While each of our over 55 world-class resorts offer its own unique amenities, all share a common goal of providing unparalleled family-style service and exhilarating experiences. Your Empire awaits.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 245
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Multi Choice Cash
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eldorado-resorts-inc-.jpeg
Eldorado Resorts, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Multi Choice Cash
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eldorado Resorts, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Multi Choice Cash in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eldorado Resorts, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Multi Choice Cash (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Multi Choice Cash cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eldorado Resorts, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Multi Choice Cash
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eldorado-resorts-inc-.jpeg
Eldorado Resorts, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Attack on IT support vendor
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party IT vendor breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Multi Choice Cash company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Multi Choice Cash company has not reported any.

In the current year, Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company and Multi Choice Cash company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company nor Multi Choice Cash company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Multi Choice Cash company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Multi Choice Cash company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Multi Choice Cash company nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Multi Choice Cash nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Multi Choice Cash company.

Eldorado Resorts, Inc. company employs more people globally than Multi Choice Cash company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Multi Choice Cash nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Multi Choice Cash nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Multi Choice Cash nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Multi Choice Cash nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Multi Choice Cash nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Multi Choice Cash nor Eldorado Resorts, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H