Comparison Overview

MUFG Investor Services

VS

Fidelity Investments

MUFG Investor Services

1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

MUFG Investor Services is a trusted partner to many of the world’s largest public and private funds, providing asset servicing and operational solutions built for alternatives. With over $1 trillion in client assets under administration, we offer fund administration, business process outsourcing, banking, payments, fund financing, foreign exchange overlay, corporate and regulatory services, custody and depositary solutions, business consulting, and more. Operating from 17 locations worldwide, we help clients mitigate risk, enhance efficiency, and navigate the operational complexities of today’s investment management landscape. As a division of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), one of the world’s largest financial groups with approximately $3 trillion in assets, we combine deep expertise with global scale. To learn more, visit us at www.mufg-investorservices.com.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 1,949
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Fidelity Investments

245 Summer St, None, Boston, MA, US, 02210
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Fidelity’s mission is to strengthen the financial well-being of our customers and deliver better outcomes for the clients and businesses we serve. Fidelity’s strength comes from the scale of our diversified, market-leading financial services businesses that serve individuals, families, employers, wealth management firms, and institutions. With assets under administration of $15.0 trillion, including discretionary assets of $5.9 trillion as of March 31, 2025, we focus on meeting the unique needs of a broad and growing customer base. Privately held for 78 years, Fidelity employs more than 77,000 associates across the United States, Ireland, and India. For our Terms and Conditions, please visit http://go.fidelity.com/LIterms

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 82,941
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mufg-investor-services.jpeg
MUFG Investor Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fidelity-investments.jpeg
Fidelity Investments
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MUFG Investor Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fidelity Investments
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MUFG Investor Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity Investments in 2025.

Incident History — MUFG Investor Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MUFG Investor Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fidelity Investments (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity Investments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mufg-investor-services.jpeg
MUFG Investor Services
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fidelity-investments.jpeg
Fidelity Investments
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Third-party software vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2014
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Fidelity Investments company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MUFG Investor Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fidelity Investments company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to MUFG Investor Services company.

In the current year, Fidelity Investments company and MUFG Investor Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fidelity Investments company nor MUFG Investor Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Fidelity Investments company and MUFG Investor Services company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Fidelity Investments company nor MUFG Investor Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Fidelity Investments company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while MUFG Investor Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither MUFG Investor Services nor Fidelity Investments holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fidelity Investments company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MUFG Investor Services company.

Fidelity Investments company employs more people globally than MUFG Investor Services company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither MUFG Investor Services nor Fidelity Investments holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MUFG Investor Services nor Fidelity Investments holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MUFG Investor Services nor Fidelity Investments holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MUFG Investor Services nor Fidelity Investments holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MUFG Investor Services nor Fidelity Investments holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MUFG Investor Services nor Fidelity Investments holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H