Comparison Overview

Muehlhan

VS

Meiser UK Ltd

Muehlhan

Schlinckstrasse 3, Hamburg, DE, 21107
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Muehlhan GmbH is the holding company for a total of more than 30 directly and indirectly held companies, employing approximately 2,800 employees in more than 35 countries. From cutting-edge research and development to seamless ongoing maintenance, we specialize in services across Wind and Industrial Services. For more than 140 years, our values have served as an unwavering anchor, steering our actions across our network of companies towards a shared vision. Values of excellence, integrity, reliability, and respect are at the core of everything we do. We are a people-first company that never jeopardizes the safety and well-being of our people.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 598
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Meiser UK Ltd

1B Poplar Road, Dumbarton, G82 2RD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Meiser Group is one of the largest grating manufacturers. There are two main manufacturing plants both of which are located in Germany with capacity to produce 10,000 ton of grating related product per month. Manufacturers of open mesh flooring, grating, profile planks, stairtreads, commercial, industrial and offshore handrail systems and staircases. Products are manufactured in a range of materials including mild steel, GRP, aluminium and stainless steel. Our products are supplied globally to all market sector operations and are approved to the necessary QA and documentation requirements. The company is ISO 9001-2008 accredited. Major Projects • Neste Oil Rotterdam – Bio Diesel production site 13,125 m² • Abbot Point (Queensland) – Coal Terminal Expansion 3,227 m² • Barrick Gold Corp. – Pueblo Viejo Gold Mine 6,021 m² • Sharq Al Jubail Project Saudi Arabia 27,863 m² • Kashagan field development 39,500 m² • Hellenic Petroleum SA – 14950 Elefsina Upgrade 24,964 m² • BMW MINI Manufacturing plant 32,000 m² • Pembroke Power Station 5,605 m²

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muehlhan-.jpeg
Muehlhan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meiser-uk-ltd.jpeg
Meiser UK Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Muehlhan
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Meiser UK Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Muehlhan in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meiser UK Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Muehlhan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Muehlhan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Meiser UK Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meiser UK Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muehlhan-.jpeg
Muehlhan
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meiser-uk-ltd.jpeg
Meiser UK Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Meiser UK Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Muehlhan company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Muehlhan company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Meiser UK Ltd company has not reported any.

In the current year, Meiser UK Ltd company and Muehlhan company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Muehlhan company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Meiser UK Ltd company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Meiser UK Ltd company nor Muehlhan company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Meiser UK Ltd company nor Muehlhan company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Muehlhan company nor Meiser UK Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Muehlhan nor Meiser UK Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Muehlhan company nor Meiser UK Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Muehlhan company employs more people globally than Meiser UK Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Muehlhan nor Meiser UK Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Muehlhan nor Meiser UK Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Muehlhan nor Meiser UK Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Muehlhan nor Meiser UK Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Muehlhan nor Meiser UK Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Muehlhan nor Meiser UK Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H