Comparison Overview

Mudd Law

VS

Kundra & Associates, P.C.

Mudd Law

411 S. Sangamon Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60607, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

With a strong focus on space law, Internet law, and technology law, Mudd Law provides dynamic, insightful, and strategic representation to domestic and international clients. More specifically, our firm's work in space law and policy involves representation in licensing, ITAR/EAR, export control, as well as matters interacting with the FAA, FCC, NOAA, and other agencies. As to Internet law, our firm represents clients in defamation, privacy, domain names, cybersquatting, revenge porn, and websites. We also focus on AI, ML, drones, space, and virtual reality. For our business clients, we provide services in relation to entity formation, governance, contracts. and intellectual property. For its business clients, the Firm provides seasoned advice and counsel on matters related to corporate structure, data security (cybersecurity), employment agreements, GDPR, intellectual property (copyrights, domain names, patents, trademarks, trade secrets), Internet, non-compete and non-disclosure agreements, policies, reputation, and social media. The Firm also represents its clients in litigation before state and federal courts throughout the United States. Although we represent businesses across a diverse range of products and services, Mudd Law provides nuanced strategic advice to clients focused in the space, drone, Internet, software, AR/MR/VR, and video gaming industries. We also possess a heightened passion for clients in the creative and manufacturing sectors, as well as all entrepreneurs and startups. For individual clients, the Firm provides strategic representation in areas associated with privacy and reputation, particularly cyberbullying, defamation, eavesdropping, identity theft, litigation, unauthorized access to email, revenge porn, surveillance, unauthorized publication of private material, and related matters. We welcome the opportunity to discuss how we can share our experience and knowledge to your advantage.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kundra & Associates, P.C.

110 North Washington Street, Rockville, 20850, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Legal Counsel and Defense in Tax Controversies Maryland's Premiere Tax Defense Firm Dealing with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and State taxing authorities is understandably intimidating. The IRS can seize property and earnings, asses exorbitant penalties and interest, shut down businesses, incarcerate people and when faced with the power of the IRS or a state taxing authority, you need tax attorneys with experience, integrity and determination to aggressively protect your interests in and out of court. Strength ◦ Integrity ◦ Focus Kundra & Associates is a Maryland-based tax law firm dedicated exclusively to tax defense and tax counsel. Our distinguished tax attorneys bring to business and individual clients an in-depth knowledge of U.S. tax law, proven negotiating skills and an impressive track record of results in court. When you choose Kundra & Associates for representation in a tax matter, you are securing the services of an attorney who is highly experienced and knows how to effectively deal with the government. We are especially adept at handling complex and high asset tax law issues. Defense in IRS or state audits of a business or personal tax return, prompt action to prevent IRS seizure of assets, advice on an IRS ruling — our tax attorneys handle any tax problem you or your business may be facing with the IRS or a state taxing authority. Our work speaks for itself: When prompt and aggressive defense is needed, other lawyers and accountants refer their clients to us. Kundra & Associates is one of the East Coast's premiere U.S. and international tax law firms. Contact our law office for immediate assistance.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muddlaw.jpeg
Mudd Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kundra-&-associates-p-c-.jpeg
Kundra & Associates, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mudd Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kundra & Associates, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mudd Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kundra & Associates, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — Mudd Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mudd Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kundra & Associates, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kundra & Associates, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muddlaw.jpeg
Mudd Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kundra-&-associates-p-c-.jpeg
Kundra & Associates, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kundra & Associates, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mudd Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kundra & Associates, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mudd Law company.

In the current year, Kundra & Associates, P.C. company and Mudd Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kundra & Associates, P.C. company nor Mudd Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kundra & Associates, P.C. company nor Mudd Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kundra & Associates, P.C. company nor Mudd Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mudd Law company nor Kundra & Associates, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mudd Law nor Kundra & Associates, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mudd Law company nor Kundra & Associates, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mudd Law company employs more people globally than Kundra & Associates, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Mudd Law nor Kundra & Associates, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mudd Law nor Kundra & Associates, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mudd Law nor Kundra & Associates, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mudd Law nor Kundra & Associates, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mudd Law nor Kundra & Associates, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mudd Law nor Kundra & Associates, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X