Comparison Overview

MTS Systems Corporation

VS

EBWA

MTS Systems Corporation

14000 Technology Dr, None, Eden Prairie, MN, US, 55344
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

MTS is a leading global supplier of test and simulation systems, differentiating ourselves through innovation, quality and an exceptional customer experience. We partner with our customers to revolutionize products and transform industries. We innovate to help make the world’s products better by simulating real-world environments, enabling clean and efficient transportation, generating renewable energy, and providing safer infrastructure, medical treatments and consumer products You have big ideas. MTS testing and simulation solutions can help bring them to life with speed, efficiency, and confidence. If you are looking for a global company with smart people, great customers, and innovative products; see opportunities in engineering, manufacturing, sales and operations, finance, human resources and more at MTS. Learn more about MTS at https://www.mts.com/en Search and apply for MTS job openings at https://www.mts.com/en/company/careers

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,861
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

EBWA

1556 Deloss St., Indianapolis, IN, US, 46201
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

EBWA is one of the oldest and most experienced electron beam welding operations in the US. Electron beam welding is a superior quality weld, and as a result it has applications in aviation, aerospace, defense, technology and other major manufacturing industries. EBWA, doing business since 1968, holds special certifications (NADCAP, AS and ISO) that are critical to the clients they serves. Please see www.ebwelding.com for more information.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mtssystemscorporation.jpeg
MTS Systems Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ebwa.jpeg
EBWA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MTS Systems Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EBWA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MTS Systems Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EBWA in 2025.

Incident History — MTS Systems Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MTS Systems Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EBWA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EBWA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mtssystemscorporation.jpeg
MTS Systems Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ebwa.jpeg
EBWA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EBWA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MTS Systems Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

MTS Systems Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas EBWA company has not reported any.

In the current year, EBWA company and MTS Systems Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EBWA company nor MTS Systems Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

MTS Systems Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other EBWA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither EBWA company nor MTS Systems Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MTS Systems Corporation company nor EBWA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MTS Systems Corporation nor EBWA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MTS Systems Corporation company nor EBWA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MTS Systems Corporation company employs more people globally than EBWA company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither MTS Systems Corporation nor EBWA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MTS Systems Corporation nor EBWA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MTS Systems Corporation nor EBWA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MTS Systems Corporation nor EBWA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MTS Systems Corporation nor EBWA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MTS Systems Corporation nor EBWA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H