Comparison Overview

Mt. Cuba Center

VS

Boston Cyberarts

Mt. Cuba Center

3120 Barley Mill Road, Hockessin, DE, 19707, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mtcubacenter.org

Mt. Cuba Center is a botanical garden that inspires an appreciation for the beauty and value of native plants and a commitment to protect the habitats that sustain them. Over the past 70 years the gardens at Mt. Cuba Center have been transformed from fallow cornfields into thriving ecologically functional landscapes, thanks to the initiative of Mr. and Mrs. Lammot du Pont Copeland. With paths that take visitors from the formal gardens of a du Pont mansion through stunning vistas, intimate woodlands, and lush meadows, Mt. Cuba Center is a botanical garden that puts the beauty of native landscapes on display to inspire conservation. What began in the 1930s as the private estate of Mr. and Mrs. Lammot du Pont Copeland is now a public garden that centers the beauty and value of native plants. In addition to cultivating the public garden's formal and naturalistic landscapes, Mt. Cuba Center staff conduct research, connect guests to the natural world and teach students about native plant horticulture. Gardens are open for general admission Wednesday to Sunday, April to November. Classes are offered year-round.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Boston Cyberarts

None
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bostoncyberarts.org

Boston Cyberarts, Inc. is a non-profit arts organization created to foster, develop and present a wide spectrum of media arts including electronic and digital experimental arts programming. We exhibit and promote the media and digital arts of Boston, New England and the world to audiences in the New England region and beyond and by doing so, helping to promote a sense of media and digital literacy, locally and regionally.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mt--cuba-center-inc-.jpeg
Mt. Cuba Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-cyberarts.jpeg
Boston Cyberarts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mt. Cuba Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boston Cyberarts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mt. Cuba Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Cyberarts in 2026.

Incident History — Mt. Cuba Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mt. Cuba Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boston Cyberarts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Cyberarts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mt--cuba-center-inc-.jpeg
Mt. Cuba Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-cyberarts.jpeg
Boston Cyberarts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Boston Cyberarts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mt. Cuba Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Boston Cyberarts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mt. Cuba Center company.

In the current year, Boston Cyberarts company and Mt. Cuba Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Boston Cyberarts company nor Mt. Cuba Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Boston Cyberarts company nor Mt. Cuba Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Boston Cyberarts company nor Mt. Cuba Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mt. Cuba Center company nor Boston Cyberarts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mt. Cuba Center nor Boston Cyberarts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mt. Cuba Center company nor Boston Cyberarts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mt. Cuba Center company employs more people globally than Boston Cyberarts company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Mt. Cuba Center nor Boston Cyberarts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mt. Cuba Center nor Boston Cyberarts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mt. Cuba Center nor Boston Cyberarts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mt. Cuba Center nor Boston Cyberarts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mt. Cuba Center nor Boston Cyberarts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mt. Cuba Center nor Boston Cyberarts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References