Comparison Overview

MSU Museum

VS

The Museum of Russian Art

MSU Museum

409 W. Circle Drive, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

The MSU Museum is an innovative and experimental collaboratory that exists to catalyze creativity. A space where people can openly explore, express, and experiment with ideas across disciplines and interests, and indulge their natural curiosity about the world. It is accredited by the American Alliance of Museums and is the state's first Smithsonian Affiliate. The MSU Museum is a registered scientific institution with the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) and a member of the International Coalition of Sites Of Conscience. Since 1857, the Museum had been collecting objects and specimens and creating exhibitions that reflect our shared histories and experiences. Collections and exhibitions are used as a catalyst in teaching, learning, and research creating a vital collaboratory for student and faculty success. Administratively at Michigan State University, the MSU Museum operates within the newly established University Arts and Collections unit within the Office of the Provost.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Museum of Russian Art

5500 Stevens Avenue, Minneapolis, 55419, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

The Museum of Russian Art collects, preserves, exhibits, and illuminates the rich artistic tapestry of Russia, past and present, through outstanding exhibitions and public programs for all audiences. The Museum upholds an independent voice and the freedom of expression to carry out its mission unconstrained by influence from foreign governments, political actors and/or corporate or individual interests.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msu-museum.jpeg
MSU Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tmora.jpeg
The Museum of Russian Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MSU Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Museum of Russian Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MSU Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Museum of Russian Art in 2026.

Incident History — MSU Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSU Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Museum of Russian Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Museum of Russian Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msu-museum.jpeg
MSU Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tmora.jpeg
The Museum of Russian Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both MSU Museum company and The Museum of Russian Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Museum of Russian Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MSU Museum company.

In the current year, The Museum of Russian Art company and MSU Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art company nor MSU Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art company nor MSU Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art company nor MSU Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MSU Museum company nor The Museum of Russian Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MSU Museum nor The Museum of Russian Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MSU Museum company nor The Museum of Russian Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MSU Museum company employs more people globally than The Museum of Russian Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither MSU Museum nor The Museum of Russian Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MSU Museum nor The Museum of Russian Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MSU Museum nor The Museum of Russian Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MSU Museum nor The Museum of Russian Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MSU Museum nor The Museum of Russian Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MSU Museum nor The Museum of Russian Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H