Comparison Overview

MPress

VS

BurdgeCooper

MPress

4100 Howard Avenue, New Orleans, 70125, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

MPress is one of the largest commercial printing companies in the Southeast region of the United States providing offset, full-color and digital printing. We are also unofficially recognized as the printer for the Saints. We produce hundreds of thousands of quality books, marketing pieces, posters, cards, mailers…you name it. We also have an in-house mailing services and can even affix items, include scratch offs and we do personalized URLs. MPress utilizes innovative capabilities e.g. personalized (variable) Data Printing - providing you with a way to look good on paper and "mpress"​ your customers. It's what we do…

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BurdgeCooper

4909 Alcoa Avenue, Vernon, CA, 90058, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

A specialty print house with roots going back a century, BurdgeCooper brings ten in-house printing and finishing processes to international clients with production facilities in Los Angeles. We offer Engraving, Letterpress, Embossing, Foil Stamping, Die Cutting, Offset, Digital, Binding, Thermography, and Edge Painting. Not only do we know where printing has been, but we know where it's going. We excel at online services and integrating the printed page to modern identity and advertising campaigns. Pixels and paper can play together. If brands tell stories, we help them create a language by bringing their presence into the physical world in a way everyone can see and feel.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mpress.jpeg
MPress
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burdgecooper.jpeg
BurdgeCooper
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MPress
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BurdgeCooper
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MPress in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BurdgeCooper in 2025.

Incident History — MPress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MPress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BurdgeCooper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BurdgeCooper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mpress.jpeg
MPress
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burdgecooper.jpeg
BurdgeCooper
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

MPress company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BurdgeCooper company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BurdgeCooper company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas MPress company has not reported any.

In the current year, BurdgeCooper company and MPress company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BurdgeCooper company nor MPress company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

BurdgeCooper company has disclosed at least one data breach, while MPress company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BurdgeCooper company nor MPress company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MPress company nor BurdgeCooper company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MPress nor BurdgeCooper holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BurdgeCooper company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MPress company.

MPress company employs more people globally than BurdgeCooper company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither MPress nor BurdgeCooper holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MPress nor BurdgeCooper holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MPress nor BurdgeCooper holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MPress nor BurdgeCooper holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MPress nor BurdgeCooper holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MPress nor BurdgeCooper holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N