Comparison Overview

Moxa

VS

Siemens

Moxa

601 Valencia Avenue #100, Brea, CA, 92823, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Critical connectivity in automation is not just about having a fast connection; it is about making people's lives better and more secure. Moxa's connectivity technology helps to make your ideas real. We develop reliable network solutions that enable devices to connect, communicate, and collaborate with systems, processes, and people.

NAICS: 33325
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,382
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Siemens

Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 1, None, Munich, None, DE, 80333
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

Siemens AG (Berlin and Munich) is a leading technology company focused on industry, infrastructure, mobility, and healthcare. The company’s purpose is to create technology to transform the everyday, for everyone. By combining the real and the digital worlds, Siemens empowers customers to accelerate their digital and sustainability transformations, making factories more efficient, cities more livable, and transportation more sustainable. Siemens also owns a majority stake in the publicly listed company Siemens Healthineers, a leading global medical technology provider pioneering breakthroughs in healthcare. For everyone. Everywhere. Sustainably. In fiscal 2024, which ended on September 30, 2024, the Siemens Group generated revenue of €75.9 billion and net income of €9.0 billion. As of September 30, 2024, the company employed around 312,000 people worldwide on the basis of continuing operations.

NAICS: 33325
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 242,813
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moxa.jpeg
Moxa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siemens.jpeg
Siemens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Moxa
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Siemens
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Moxa in 2025.

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Siemens in 2025.

Incident History — Moxa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Moxa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Siemens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Siemens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moxa.jpeg
Moxa
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siemens.jpeg
Siemens
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unlocked bootloader
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Siemens company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Moxa company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Moxa and Siemens have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Siemens company and Moxa company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Siemens company nor Moxa company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Siemens company nor Moxa company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Siemens company nor Moxa company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Both Moxa company and Siemens company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Moxa nor Siemens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Siemens company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Moxa company.

Siemens company employs more people globally than Moxa company, reflecting its scale as a Automation Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Moxa nor Siemens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Moxa nor Siemens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Moxa nor Siemens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Moxa nor Siemens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Moxa nor Siemens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Moxa nor Siemens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X