Comparison Overview

Mousegraphics

VS

Fitness Wear, inc

Mousegraphics

1414 W. 14th St, Tempe, 85281, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

High Quality Digital Print Services – at affordable pricing. That is the mission of Mousegraphics, our family owned and operated company that services Tempe and the greater Phoenix area. We pride ourselves at providing our customers with a wide-range of digital printing services including vehicle wraps, trade show displays, customizable banners, professional color signage and much more. Mousegraphics relies on state of the art computers, print materials, printers, operated by professional and highly trained specialists in the digital printing trade. We strive to work with every customer to exceed their expectations and suiting their needs for quality printed materials based on image quality, size, durability, and viewing distance. Most importantly, Mousegraphics will deliver high-quality digital printing services within your budget & without any pricing surprises. Mousegraphics also offers our customers an easy to use online ordering portal which allows you to receive an estimate, send us files for review and reorder high-quality digital printed materials – all at the click of your mouse. The digital printing industry is a highly competitive one indeed. At Mousegraphics, we ensure to deliver exceptional customer service with every interaction and digital printing job we provide. Call 480-894-1992 or visit www.mousegraphics.com to order online. We look forward to working with you!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fitness Wear, inc

1940B Lehigh Ave., Glenview, Illinois, 60026, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Fitness Wear has been providing Chicago with quality screen printing for over 30 years. With our passion and expertise in custom clothing, Fitness Wear pledges satisfaction to every customer. There is no job too small or complex for us. Fitness Wear loves bringing anyone's custom screen printing ideas to life. Contact us with any questions or inquiries. (847)486-1704 [email protected]

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mousegraphics.jpeg
Mousegraphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitness-wear-inc.jpeg
Fitness Wear, inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mousegraphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fitness Wear, inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mousegraphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fitness Wear, inc in 2025.

Incident History — Mousegraphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mousegraphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fitness Wear, inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fitness Wear, inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mousegraphics.jpeg
Mousegraphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitness-wear-inc.jpeg
Fitness Wear, inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Mousegraphics company and Fitness Wear, inc company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Fitness Wear, inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mousegraphics company.

In the current year, Fitness Wear, inc company and Mousegraphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc company nor Mousegraphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc company nor Mousegraphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc company nor Mousegraphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mousegraphics company nor Fitness Wear, inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mousegraphics nor Fitness Wear, inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mousegraphics company nor Fitness Wear, inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mousegraphics company employs more people globally than Fitness Wear, inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Mousegraphics nor Fitness Wear, inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mousegraphics nor Fitness Wear, inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mousegraphics nor Fitness Wear, inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mousegraphics nor Fitness Wear, inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mousegraphics nor Fitness Wear, inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mousegraphics nor Fitness Wear, inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L