Comparison Overview

Mount Sinai Health System

VS

St. Luke's University Health Network

Mount Sinai Health System

150 East 42nd Street, New York, NY, US, 10017
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mountsinai.org/

The Mount Sinai Health System is an integrated health system committed to providing distinguished care, conducting transformative research, and advancing biomedical education. Structured around seven hospital campuses and a single medical school, the Health System has an extensive ambulatory network and a range of inpatient and outpatient services—from community-based facilities to tertiary and quaternary care. WHO WE ARE We are compassionate collaborators—48,000 strong—working to heal, teach, and advance medicine in New York City and throughout the world. WHAT WE BELIEVE We believe in challenging the status quo. Forging a new pathway in clinical excellence is only possible by putting the patient at the center of the experience. WHY WORK WITH US Here, innovation is valued and collaboration is integral. Mount Sinai is full of friendly, helpful people who share a common devotion to delivering exceptional patient care. Yet we’re as diverse as the city we call home—culturally, ethnically, in outlook and lifestyle. When you join us, you become part of Mount Sinai’s unrivaled record of achievement, education, and advancement as we revolutionize healthcare together.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 29,627
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

St. Luke's University Health Network

801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, 18015, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.sluhn.org

Founded in 1872, St. Luke’s University Health Network (SLUHN) is a fully integrated, regional, non-profit network of more than 23,000 employees providing services at 16 campuses and 350+ outpatient sites. With annual net revenue of $4 billion, the Network’s service area includes 11 counties in two states: Lehigh, Northampton, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Montgomery, Monroe, Schuylkill and Luzerne counties in Pennsylvania and Warren and Hunterdon counties in New Jersey. St. Luke’s hospitals operate the largest network of trauma centers in Pennsylvania, with the Bethlehem Campus being home to St. Luke’s Children’s Hospital. Dedicated to advancing medical education, St. Luke’s is the preeminent teaching hospital in central-eastern Pennsylvania. In partnership with Temple University, the Network established the Lehigh Valley’s first and only four-year medical school campus. It also operates the nation’s longest continuously operating School of Nursing, established in 1884, and over 50 fully accredited graduate medical educational programs with more than 500 residents and fellows. In 2022, St. Luke’s, a member of the Children’s Hospital Association, opened the Lehigh Valley’s first and only free-standing facility dedicated entirely to kids. SLUHN is the only Lehigh Valley-based health care system to earn Medicare’s five-star ratings (the highest) for quality, efficiency and patient satisfaction. It is both a Leapfrog Group and Healthgrades Top Hospital and a Newsweek World’s Best Hospital. The Network’s flagship University Hospital has earned the 100 Top Major Teaching Hospital designation from Premier 13 times total and eleven years in a row, including in 2023 when it was identified as THE #4 TEACHING HOSPITAL IN THE COUNTRY.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 10,851
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mountsinainyc.jpeg
Mount Sinai Health System
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st--luke's-hospital.jpeg
St. Luke's University Health Network
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mount Sinai Health System
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
St. Luke's University Health Network
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mount Sinai Health System in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Luke's University Health Network in 2026.

Incident History — Mount Sinai Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mount Sinai Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — St. Luke's University Health Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Luke's University Health Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mountsinainyc.jpeg
Mount Sinai Health System
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st--luke's-hospital.jpeg
St. Luke's University Health Network
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mount Sinai Health System company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to St. Luke's University Health Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, St. Luke's University Health Network company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mount Sinai Health System company.

In the current year, St. Luke's University Health Network company and Mount Sinai Health System company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither St. Luke's University Health Network company nor Mount Sinai Health System company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither St. Luke's University Health Network company nor Mount Sinai Health System company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither St. Luke's University Health Network company nor Mount Sinai Health System company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mount Sinai Health System company nor St. Luke's University Health Network company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mount Sinai Health System nor St. Luke's University Health Network holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mount Sinai Health System company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to St. Luke's University Health Network company.

Mount Sinai Health System company employs more people globally than St. Luke's University Health Network company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Mount Sinai Health System nor St. Luke's University Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mount Sinai Health System nor St. Luke's University Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mount Sinai Health System nor St. Luke's University Health Network holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mount Sinai Health System nor St. Luke's University Health Network holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mount Sinai Health System nor St. Luke's University Health Network holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mount Sinai Health System nor St. Luke's University Health Network holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References