Comparison Overview

Mountain High Insurance

VS

Ace Agent Financial

Mountain High Insurance

10841 S. Crossroads Drive, Parker, CO 80134, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mountainhighinsurance.com

Whether you are shopping for auto, home, or business insurance, our highly experienced team of insurance agents can help you find the right coverage, no matter what your needs are. Mountain High Insurance is proud to provide insurance products from some of the nation's largest insurance providers including: Traveler's, The Hartford, MetLife, Encompass, State Auto, Safeco, Progressive, BRANCH, and many more. Our name is trusted throughout the community. To speak directly with an experienced insurance professional, simply give us a call anytime or feel free to utilize any of the interactive tools offered on our website. We look forward to working with you.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ace Agent Financial

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
www.aceagentfinancial.com

At Ace Agent Financial, we empower individuals and families across the United States to protect what matters most — their future, their finances, and their freedom. We specialize in: Career Opportunities for Agents Life Insurance & Financial Protection Retirement & Wealth Planning Our mission is to help people from all walks of life achieve financial independence and professional success. Whether you're seeking coverage, looking to build a career in financial services, or planning your future — we're here to guide you every step of the way. ✅ Family-Focused Solutions ✅ Career Growth with Mentorship ✅ Proven Business System Join our growing network of agents and clients making smart moves for their future. 📍 Based in the USA | Serving Nationwide

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mountain-high-insurance.jpeg
Mountain High Insurance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aceagentfinancial.jpeg
Ace Agent Financial
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mountain High Insurance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ace Agent Financial
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mountain High Insurance in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ace Agent Financial in 2026.

Incident History — Mountain High Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mountain High Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ace Agent Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ace Agent Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mountain-high-insurance.jpeg
Mountain High Insurance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aceagentfinancial.jpeg
Ace Agent Financial
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ace Agent Financial company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mountain High Insurance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ace Agent Financial company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mountain High Insurance company.

In the current year, Ace Agent Financial company and Mountain High Insurance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ace Agent Financial company nor Mountain High Insurance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ace Agent Financial company nor Mountain High Insurance company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ace Agent Financial company nor Mountain High Insurance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mountain High Insurance company nor Ace Agent Financial company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mountain High Insurance nor Ace Agent Financial holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mountain High Insurance company nor Ace Agent Financial company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mountain High Insurance company employs more people globally than Ace Agent Financial company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance Agencies and Brokerages.

Neither Mountain High Insurance nor Ace Agent Financial holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mountain High Insurance nor Ace Agent Financial holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mountain High Insurance nor Ace Agent Financial holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mountain High Insurance nor Ace Agent Financial holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mountain High Insurance nor Ace Agent Financial holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mountain High Insurance nor Ace Agent Financial holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References