Comparison Overview

Mountain Dog Sign Company

VS

Thomas Printworks

Mountain Dog Sign Company

1620 N Mamer RD Suite D100, Spokane Valley, WA, US, 99216
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Mountain Dog Sign Company is a minority, woman-owned custom sign manufacturer, established in 2011, serving the Northwest and beyond. We specialize in ADA compliant braille, architectural sign and art finishes, graphics, vinyl, interior and exterior projects for clients large and small. Our in-house design and production teams ensure satisfaction with everything from a logo design to entire building signage. With Mountain Dog Sign Company you will always find quality, care and dedication to all your signage projects.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Thomas Printworks

600 N. Central Expressway, Richardson, TX, 75080, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

We started with a focus on traditional blueprints servicing the architecture, engineering, and construction industries. We never would have imagined that our business would now be in its third generation of family ownership and have over 300 employees spanning 25 locations in the U.S. Thomas Printworks hasn’t just survived, but thrived as a leading choice among the A/E/C industry for commercial printing needs. We’ve been able to do so because of how we build relationships with our customers and stay up to date on the latest technology in the trade. We set the standard for our customers rather than following it. Today, Thomas Printworks is a recognized name in the industry with locations also in the Houston, Austin, San Antonio, Phoenix, Minneapolis, Orlando, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami metropolitan areas. When we say It’s All In The Name, we take that personally. Thomas Printworks has lasted over 60 years because of our name and the quality of service our clients expect and rely on from that name. For our Dallas customers, you can even find our original location still in operation after all these years. The technology, processes, and product demands may change, but what won’t change is our dedication to providing friendly and professional service. If you’re ready to bring your printing and document management ideas to life, contact one of our specialists today and we’ll reach back to help you start your next project.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 344
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mountain-dog-sign-company.jpeg
Mountain Dog Sign Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-reprographics.jpeg
Thomas Printworks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mountain Dog Sign Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thomas Printworks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mountain Dog Sign Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thomas Printworks in 2025.

Incident History — Mountain Dog Sign Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mountain Dog Sign Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thomas Printworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thomas Printworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mountain-dog-sign-company.jpeg
Mountain Dog Sign Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thomas-reprographics.jpeg
Thomas Printworks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Thomas Printworks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mountain Dog Sign Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Thomas Printworks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mountain Dog Sign Company company.

In the current year, Thomas Printworks company and Mountain Dog Sign Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thomas Printworks company nor Mountain Dog Sign Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Thomas Printworks company nor Mountain Dog Sign Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Thomas Printworks company nor Mountain Dog Sign Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mountain Dog Sign Company company nor Thomas Printworks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mountain Dog Sign Company nor Thomas Printworks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mountain Dog Sign Company company nor Thomas Printworks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Thomas Printworks company employs more people globally than Mountain Dog Sign Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Mountain Dog Sign Company nor Thomas Printworks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mountain Dog Sign Company nor Thomas Printworks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mountain Dog Sign Company nor Thomas Printworks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mountain Dog Sign Company nor Thomas Printworks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mountain Dog Sign Company nor Thomas Printworks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mountain Dog Sign Company nor Thomas Printworks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N