Comparison Overview

Mount Baker Theatre

VS

Austin Symphony Orchestra

Mount Baker Theatre

104 N Commercial St, Bellingham, Washington, 98225, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mountbakertheatre.com/

The Mount Baker Theatre in downtown Bellingham's Arts District is the largest performing arts facility of its kind north of Seattle. A beautifully restored 1927 architectural treasure, listed on the register of National Historic Places, the theatre is dedicated to showcasing some of the best live performing artists on both the professional and community levels for audiences in the North Puget Sound area and the Lower Mainland of British Columbia.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Austin Symphony Orchestra

1101 Red River, Austin, TX, 78701, US
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799
http://www.austinsymphony.org

The mission of the Austin Symphony Orchestra Society, Inc. is to enhance the cultural quality of life for the adults and young people of Austin and Central Texas by providing excellence in music performance and educational programming. Founded in 1911, the Austin Symphony Orchestra is Austin’s oldest performing arts group. The ASO offers a complete season of musical and educational programming. Classical concerts include a series of eight concert pairs running monthly September through June in the state-of-the-art Joe R. & Teresa Lozano Long Center for the Performing Arts. Our season also features the Sarah & Ernest Butler Pops Series with performances in October, December, February, and June Pops at Long Center. Programming for the entire family includes the Halloween Children’s Concert, and Handel’s Messiah, as well as the popular James C. Armstrong Youth Educations Programs, which include Tuneful Tales, Young People’s Concerts, High School Concert Tour and a variety of other school programs.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 101
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mount-baker-theatre.jpeg
Mount Baker Theatre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/austin-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Austin Symphony Orchestra
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mount Baker Theatre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Austin Symphony Orchestra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mount Baker Theatre in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Austin Symphony Orchestra in 2025.

Incident History — Mount Baker Theatre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mount Baker Theatre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Austin Symphony Orchestra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Austin Symphony Orchestra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mount-baker-theatre.jpeg
Mount Baker Theatre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/austin-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Austin Symphony Orchestra
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Mount Baker Theatre company and Austin Symphony Orchestra company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Austin Symphony Orchestra company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mount Baker Theatre company.

In the current year, Austin Symphony Orchestra company and Mount Baker Theatre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Austin Symphony Orchestra company nor Mount Baker Theatre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Austin Symphony Orchestra company nor Mount Baker Theatre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Austin Symphony Orchestra company nor Mount Baker Theatre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mount Baker Theatre company nor Austin Symphony Orchestra company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mount Baker Theatre nor Austin Symphony Orchestra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mount Baker Theatre company nor Austin Symphony Orchestra company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Austin Symphony Orchestra company employs more people globally than Mount Baker Theatre company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Mount Baker Theatre nor Austin Symphony Orchestra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mount Baker Theatre nor Austin Symphony Orchestra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mount Baker Theatre nor Austin Symphony Orchestra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mount Baker Theatre nor Austin Symphony Orchestra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mount Baker Theatre nor Austin Symphony Orchestra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mount Baker Theatre nor Austin Symphony Orchestra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References