Comparison Overview

Motley Magazine

VS

Samhain Publishing

Motley Magazine

23 Sheraton Court, Cork, County Cork, T12 Y594, IE
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Motley is UCC’s official monthly magazine, written and edited by its students, catering for the interests of our readers (including students, staff and those outside the university) through our Current Affairs, Entertainments, Features and Opinion, and Fashion sections: exclusive interviews, investigations into the college itself, analysis of current affairs, features on local events, articles on all aspects of university life, satirical writings, food and health, the latest fashion trends, extensive photo-shoots, and all things in the world of entertainment from film, TV and music to books, gaming and theatre. First founded by the UCC Journalism and Media Society in 2006, the magazine is now funded by the SU Media Executive. It is run on a non-profit basis each month and distributed free of charge around the university’s campus and various businesses in Cork and the surrounding areas.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Samhain Publishing

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

It's all about the story... With an auspicious goal of bringing to compulsive readers the books that allow them to discover new worlds, and be taken on adventures through the creative minds of today's brightest authors Samhain Publishing came to be November 1st 2005. It's all about Quality... Look for the gold "flip" on the cover and know you're getting a Samhain title. The Samhain seal of approval tells you we've carefully selected the content, that has been professionally edited, and professionally packaged for your enjoyment. Visit our website and see what we have to offer.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/motleymagazine.jpeg
Motley Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samhain-publishing.jpeg
Samhain Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Motley Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Samhain Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Motley Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Samhain Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — Motley Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motley Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Samhain Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samhain Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/motleymagazine.jpeg
Motley Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samhain-publishing.jpeg
Samhain Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Samhain Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Motley Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Samhain Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Motley Magazine company.

In the current year, Samhain Publishing company and Motley Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Samhain Publishing company nor Motley Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Samhain Publishing company nor Motley Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Samhain Publishing company nor Motley Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Motley Magazine company nor Samhain Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Motley Magazine nor Samhain Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Motley Magazine company nor Samhain Publishing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Samhain Publishing company employs more people globally than Motley Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Motley Magazine nor Samhain Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Motley Magazine nor Samhain Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Motley Magazine nor Samhain Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Motley Magazine nor Samhain Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Motley Magazine nor Samhain Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Motley Magazine nor Samhain Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.