Comparison Overview

Mossack Fonseca & Co.

VS

Constructive Lawyers

Mossack Fonseca & Co.

54th Street, Panama, 0832-0886, PA
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

Established in 1977, Mossack Fonseca has become a global leader in the creation of legal structures designed for asset protection, management and control. Over 450 employees worldwide. MISSION To deliver to our global client base, an integrated approach involving legal, fiduciary, investment advisory and digital solutions, of a qualified and reliable nature, through the various business components within the MF group, our worldwide network of offices, a highly skilled staff, our trademark utilization of technology, in order to satisfy client demand by adding value, and at the same time generate returns for our directors, employees and community in general. VISSION To be recognized as THE local and international leader in the provision of legal, trust, investment advisory and digital solutions; by virtue of our established business network, and through our continuing commitment to client satisfaction and excellence. CORE VALUES Discipline, Responsibility, Efficiency, Initiative, Honesty, Loyalty, Commitment, Innovation, Excellence in Client Satisfaction.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Constructive Lawyers

ул. Б. Гринчеко, 7, оф. 3, Киев, 01034, UA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

«Constructive Lawyers» - это независимая украинская юридическая фирма, которая предлагает профессиональное сопровождение крупного, малого и среднего бизнеса независимо от организационно-правовой формы предпринимательской деятельности. Сегодня в юридической фирме работает более 30-ти юристов различной специализации. В зависимости от направлений работы наши юристы входят в состав одной из 10 практик: строительное право, земельное право и недвижимость, политическое право, судебная практика, корпоративное право, налоговый консалтинг, финансовое и банковское право, право интеллектуальной собственности, семейное и наследственное право, уголовное право.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mossack-fonseca-&-co-.jpeg
Mossack Fonseca & Co.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/constructive-lawyers.jpeg
Constructive Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mossack Fonseca & Co.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Constructive Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mossack Fonseca & Co. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Constructive Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Mossack Fonseca & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mossack Fonseca & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Constructive Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Constructive Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mossack-fonseca-&-co-.jpeg
Mossack Fonseca & Co.
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2016
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/constructive-lawyers.jpeg
Constructive Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Constructive Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mossack Fonseca & Co. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mossack Fonseca & Co. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Constructive Lawyers company has not reported any.

In the current year, Constructive Lawyers company and Mossack Fonseca & Co. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Constructive Lawyers company nor Mossack Fonseca & Co. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Constructive Lawyers company nor Mossack Fonseca & Co. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Constructive Lawyers company nor Mossack Fonseca & Co. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mossack Fonseca & Co. company nor Constructive Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mossack Fonseca & Co. nor Constructive Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mossack Fonseca & Co. company nor Constructive Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mossack Fonseca & Co. company employs more people globally than Constructive Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Mossack Fonseca & Co. nor Constructive Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mossack Fonseca & Co. nor Constructive Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mossack Fonseca & Co. nor Constructive Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mossack Fonseca & Co. nor Constructive Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mossack Fonseca & Co. nor Constructive Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mossack Fonseca & Co. nor Constructive Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X