Comparison Overview

Morris Psychological Group

VS

TheraMind

Morris Psychological Group

50 Cherry Hill Road, Parsippany, NJ, 07054, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Morris Psychological Group is a team of expertly trained mental health professionals. We adhere to the highest standards of professionalism, training, and leadership, and are committed to improving the lives of those we serve. In order to achieve our mission we pledge to: Deliver the highest quality mental health services; Present a welcoming environment and supportive experience for those who seek our services; Offer leadership to the mental health field; Adhere to the highest level of professional standards and ethics; Maintain a superior level of expertise through advanced training; Perform our professional responsibilities diligently and sensitively as an integrated team; Exceed the expectations of those we serve

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TheraMind

977 Lakeview Parkway, Vernon Hills, Ilinois, 60061, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

TheraMind Services offers TMS therapy for drug resistant depression (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation). TMS is a noninvasive, non-drug, side effect free, procedure that uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain to improve symptoms of depression. Through a treatment coil, the TMS therapy system generates highly concentrated, magnetic fields which are rapidly switched on and off. These magnetic fields do not directly affect the whole brain; they only reach a few centimeters into the brain, directly beneath the treatment coil. Each TheraMind® Center facilitates a team approach to wellness. TheraMind Directors and Specialists consult with referring physicians, mental health providers and family for a coordinated approach to each patient’s treatment. Our Centers are equipped with state-of-the-art TMS therapy systems and staffed with experienced compassionate personnel. Treatment rooms are designed for our patients’ comfort and our treatment enhancement programs are designed for optimum therapy results. TheraMind accepts health insurance and our Specialists work with you to determine your benefits. Since the 1980s, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation has been used to study the nerve fibers that carry information about movements from the brain to the spinal cord and on to the muscles. In the late 1990s, physicians began to explore the therapeutic potential of TMS for the treatment of a variety of diseases, with depression being the most thoroughly studied to date. Since then, more than 20 randomized, controlled trials studying TMS as a treatment for depression have been published by researchers throughout the world. Pleaser check our website for the specific services available at the TheraMind Center closest to you.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morris-psychological-group.jpeg
Morris Psychological Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theramind.jpeg
TheraMind
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Morris Psychological Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TheraMind
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Morris Psychological Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TheraMind in 2026.

Incident History — Morris Psychological Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Morris Psychological Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TheraMind (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TheraMind cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morris-psychological-group.jpeg
Morris Psychological Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theramind.jpeg
TheraMind
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Morris Psychological Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TheraMind company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TheraMind company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Morris Psychological Group company.

In the current year, TheraMind company and Morris Psychological Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TheraMind company nor Morris Psychological Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TheraMind company nor Morris Psychological Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TheraMind company nor Morris Psychological Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Morris Psychological Group company nor TheraMind company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Morris Psychological Group nor TheraMind holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TheraMind company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Morris Psychological Group company.

Morris Psychological Group company employs more people globally than TheraMind company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Morris Psychological Group nor TheraMind holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Morris Psychological Group nor TheraMind holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Morris Psychological Group nor TheraMind holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Morris Psychological Group nor TheraMind holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Morris Psychological Group nor TheraMind holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Morris Psychological Group nor TheraMind holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N