Comparison Overview

MORGAN MARINE LTD

VS

Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd

MORGAN MARINE LTD

Llandybie, Ammanford, SA18 3JG, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Morgan Marine is a UK leader in the design, manufacture and installation of standard and bespoke non-security and LPCB security rated enclosures, door-sets, barsets, cages, access covers and ventilation options to the utilities, rail, construction, renewables and security sectors. Engineering GRP and steel since 1965, Morgan Marine operates from a prestigious sales and manufacturing site in South Wales with over 9 acres and 120,000 sq. ft of manufacturing. The company is managed by a team of experienced professionals and has full in house sales, engineering and design support.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd

Homefield Road, Haverhill, CB9 8QP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-23

• LPCB 1048-1 Level 4 Approved Sprinkler Contractor • ISO 9001 Quality System • Designs to BS EN 12845 / FM Global / NFPA • Automatic Sprinkler Systems • Special Risk Foam and Deluge Systems • Hose Reel and Hydrants • Fabrication; Installation; Commission • Maintenance and Servicing We have been one of the UK’s leading providers of fire sprinkler, waterspray and foam systems since the company was established in 1972. We design and install systems to the high standards demanded by both the UK and US licensing authorities and insurance industries. We are fully approved by the Loss Prevention Certification Board for all types of sprinkler system and all hazard classifications. We provide an annual maintenance and inspection service for all our systems as well as those installed by other suppliers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morgan-marine-limited.jpeg
MORGAN MARINE LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fire-security-sprinkler-installations-ltd.jpeg
Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MORGAN MARINE LTD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MORGAN MARINE LTD in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — MORGAN MARINE LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MORGAN MARINE LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morgan-marine-limited.jpeg
MORGAN MARINE LTD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fire-security-sprinkler-installations-ltd.jpeg
Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MORGAN MARINE LTD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MORGAN MARINE LTD company.

In the current year, Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd company and MORGAN MARINE LTD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd company nor MORGAN MARINE LTD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd company nor MORGAN MARINE LTD company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd company nor MORGAN MARINE LTD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MORGAN MARINE LTD company nor Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MORGAN MARINE LTD nor Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MORGAN MARINE LTD company nor Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MORGAN MARINE LTD company employs more people globally than Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither MORGAN MARINE LTD nor Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MORGAN MARINE LTD nor Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MORGAN MARINE LTD nor Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MORGAN MARINE LTD nor Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MORGAN MARINE LTD nor Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MORGAN MARINE LTD nor Fire Security (Sprinkler Installations) Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H