Comparison Overview

Morgan & Claypool Publishers

VS

Ashgate Publishing Ltd

Morgan & Claypool Publishers

1210 5th Ave, San Rafael, California, 94901, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We publish SHORT BOOKS on the most advanced technology and science research in engineering, computer science, life science, physics. Get the information you need quickly and efficiently because we always provide fast, personal customer service. We offer print and e-books to individuals, and digital library access to institutions. Check us out on Twitter: @MorganClaypool Facebook: @morganclaypoolpublishers

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ashgate Publishing Ltd

Union Road, Farnham, GU9 7PT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

The Ashgate Publishing Group incorporates Ashgate Publishing, Gower Publishing and Lund Humphries. The company was founded in 1967 and has offices in the UK, the USA and Australia. Ashgate is dedicated to publishing the finest academic research, and each year publishes more than 800 new books across fifteen subject areas in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Gower is one of the most trusted brands in business and management and provides business practitioners and researchers worldwide with the highest quality work in their field. Lund Humphries has a long-established reputation as a leading publisher of highly illustrated artist monographs, reference books and surveys for specialists and enthusiasts.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morgan-claypool-publishers.jpeg
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ashgate-publishing-ltd.jpeg
Ashgate Publishing Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ashgate Publishing Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Morgan & Claypool Publishers in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ashgate Publishing Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Morgan & Claypool Publishers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Morgan & Claypool Publishers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ashgate Publishing Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ashgate Publishing Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morgan-claypool-publishers.jpeg
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ashgate-publishing-ltd.jpeg
Ashgate Publishing Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ashgate Publishing Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Morgan & Claypool Publishers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ashgate Publishing Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Morgan & Claypool Publishers company.

In the current year, Ashgate Publishing Ltd company and Morgan & Claypool Publishers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ashgate Publishing Ltd company nor Morgan & Claypool Publishers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ashgate Publishing Ltd company nor Morgan & Claypool Publishers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ashgate Publishing Ltd company nor Morgan & Claypool Publishers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Morgan & Claypool Publishers company nor Ashgate Publishing Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Morgan & Claypool Publishers nor Ashgate Publishing Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Morgan & Claypool Publishers company nor Ashgate Publishing Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ashgate Publishing Ltd company employs more people globally than Morgan & Claypool Publishers company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Morgan & Claypool Publishers nor Ashgate Publishing Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Morgan & Claypool Publishers nor Ashgate Publishing Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Morgan & Claypool Publishers nor Ashgate Publishing Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Morgan & Claypool Publishers nor Ashgate Publishing Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Morgan & Claypool Publishers nor Ashgate Publishing Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Morgan & Claypool Publishers nor Ashgate Publishing Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.