Comparison Overview

MORE Realty

VS

Coldwell Banker Realty

MORE Realty

16037 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd Suite 150 Portland, Oregon 97224, US
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

$129.00/MONTH | $395 TRANSACTION FEE | $3950 CAP FREE E&O โ€šร„ยข NO HIDDEN FEES โ€šร„ยข NO FRANCHISE FEES โ€šร„ยข NO DESK FEES We pride ourselves on offering GREAT SUPPORT with cutting-edge tools, training, leads programs, classes, and assistance to help you be successful. As a result, we are able to offer the best of what you need! PLUS you keep 100% of YOUR commissions!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 501-1,000
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Coldwell Banker Realty

175 Park Avenue, Madison, NJ, 07940, US
Last Update: 2025-03-17 (UTC)

Excellent

Coldwell Banker Realty is one of the nationโ€™s largest real estate brokerages operating in 50 markets in the United States. Powered by a network of approximately 55,000 independent real estate agents and 600 offices, Coldwell Banker Realty, a subsidiary of Anywhere Real Estate Inc. (NYSE:HOUS), operates the company-owned real estate brokerage offices that are part of the worldwide Coldwell Banker Real Estate LLC brand. For more information, visit www.ColdwellBankerHomes.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 45,100
Subsidiaries: 43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/more-realty.jpeg
MORE Realty
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coldwell-banker-residential-brokerage.jpeg
Coldwell Banker Realty
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
MORE Realty
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coldwell Banker Realty
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MORE Realty in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coldwell Banker Realty in 2025.

Incident History โ€” MORE Realty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MORE Realty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Coldwell Banker Realty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coldwell Banker Realty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/more-realty.jpeg
MORE Realty
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coldwell-banker-residential-brokerage.jpeg
Coldwell Banker Realty
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both MORE Realty company and Coldwell Banker Realty company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Coldwell Banker Realty company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MORE Realty company.

In the current year, Coldwell Banker Realty company and MORE Realty company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Coldwell Banker Realty company nor MORE Realty company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Coldwell Banker Realty company nor MORE Realty company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Coldwell Banker Realty company nor MORE Realty company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MORE Realty company nor Coldwell Banker Realty company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Coldwell Banker Realty company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MORE Realty company.

Coldwell Banker Realty company employs more people globally than MORE Realty company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.