Comparison Overview

FirstFlash! Line

VS

Phoenix Inks and Coatings

FirstFlash! Line

6528 Constitution Drive, Fort Wayne, 46804, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

FirstFlash! Line specializes in the manufacture and distribution of specialized custom printed products. We have thousands of clients around the country utilizing EventTape plastic roll banners to maximize their brand or identity at events and remotes. If there is anything we can do for you please call us today 800 213-5274 or check out our website at www.firstflash.com. Our mission at FirstFlash! Line is to partner with you to develop successful marketing and branding solutions. We strive to cultivate long-lasting relationships with our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Phoenix Inks and Coatings

20w267 101st Street, Lemont, 60439-9672, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Phoenix Inks and Coatings has been a standard for Printing Inks and Coatings within the printing industry. We strive every day to keep an edge on the printing market as well as creating new unique products. ​Phoenix Inks is determined to remain the standard for quality inks and coatings for many years to come. If you or someone you know has a new product in mind or would like to choose from one of our many quality products, please don’t hesitate to let us know! ​We are here to make your business work!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moose-lake-products-company.jpeg
FirstFlash! Line
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phoenix-inks-and-coatings.jpeg
Phoenix Inks and Coatings
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FirstFlash! Line
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Phoenix Inks and Coatings
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FirstFlash! Line in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phoenix Inks and Coatings in 2025.

Incident History — FirstFlash! Line (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FirstFlash! Line cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Phoenix Inks and Coatings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phoenix Inks and Coatings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moose-lake-products-company.jpeg
FirstFlash! Line
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phoenix-inks-and-coatings.jpeg
Phoenix Inks and Coatings
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Phoenix Inks and Coatings company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FirstFlash! Line company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Phoenix Inks and Coatings company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FirstFlash! Line company.

In the current year, Phoenix Inks and Coatings company and FirstFlash! Line company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Phoenix Inks and Coatings company nor FirstFlash! Line company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Phoenix Inks and Coatings company nor FirstFlash! Line company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Phoenix Inks and Coatings company nor FirstFlash! Line company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FirstFlash! Line company nor Phoenix Inks and Coatings company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FirstFlash! Line nor Phoenix Inks and Coatings holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FirstFlash! Line company nor Phoenix Inks and Coatings company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phoenix Inks and Coatings company employs more people globally than FirstFlash! Line company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither FirstFlash! Line nor Phoenix Inks and Coatings holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FirstFlash! Line nor Phoenix Inks and Coatings holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FirstFlash! Line nor Phoenix Inks and Coatings holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FirstFlash! Line nor Phoenix Inks and Coatings holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FirstFlash! Line nor Phoenix Inks and Coatings holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FirstFlash! Line nor Phoenix Inks and Coatings holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N