Comparison Overview

Mooiland

VS

PLAZZA AG

Mooiland

Arnoud van Gelderweg 69 , Grave, 5361 CV, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mooiland.nl

As a corporation, we house more than 50,000 people in 22,000 homes throughout the Netherlands. We give at home by providing sufficient affordable, good quality and sustainable rental housing. But we like to do more. We like to be a corporation that is recognisable, approachable and accessible to ouw residents.

NAICS: 53
NAICS Definition: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employees: 302
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

PLAZZA AG

Sieberstrasse 5, Zürich, 8055, CH
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
https://www.plazza.ch/

PLAZZA plant, realisiert, bewirtschaftet und vermarktet Liegenschaften und Immobilienprojekte in der Schweiz. PLAZZA bewirtschaftet gezielt ihr Bestandesportfolio an Wohn- und Geschäftsliegenschaften mit Schwerpunkt im Wirtschaftsraum Zürich. Hinzu kommen Entwicklungsliegenschaften und -projekte in den Wirtschaftszentren Zürich und Lausanne, die schrittweise einer künftigen Nutzung zugeführt werden sollen. Die geografisch und segmentspezifisch klare Ausrichtung des Portfolios auf zentrumsnahe, gut erschlossene Liegenschaften trägt zur nachhaltigen Stabilität von PLAZZA bei und wird auch in Zukunft Erfolg versprechend sein. Die PLAZZA AG (Ticker: PLAN) ist seit Juni 2015 an der SIX Swiss Exchange kotiert und hat ihren Sitz in Zürich.

NAICS: 53
NAICS Definition: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mooiland.jpeg
Mooiland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plazza-ag.jpeg
PLAZZA AG
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mooiland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PLAZZA AG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mooiland in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PLAZZA AG in 2025.

Incident History — Mooiland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mooiland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PLAZZA AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PLAZZA AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mooiland.jpeg
Mooiland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/plazza-ag.jpeg
PLAZZA AG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PLAZZA AG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mooiland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PLAZZA AG company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mooiland company.

In the current year, PLAZZA AG company and Mooiland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PLAZZA AG company nor Mooiland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PLAZZA AG company nor Mooiland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PLAZZA AG company nor Mooiland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mooiland company nor PLAZZA AG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mooiland nor PLAZZA AG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mooiland company nor PLAZZA AG company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mooiland company employs more people globally than PLAZZA AG company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services.

Neither Mooiland nor PLAZZA AG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mooiland nor PLAZZA AG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mooiland nor PLAZZA AG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mooiland nor PLAZZA AG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mooiland nor PLAZZA AG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mooiland nor PLAZZA AG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References