Comparison Overview

Mooiland

VS

EV Initiative Inc.

Mooiland

Arnoud van Gelderweg 69 , Grave, 5361 CV, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

As a corporation, we house more than 50,000 people in 22,000 homes throughout the Netherlands. We give at home by providing sufficient affordable, good quality and sustainable rental housing. But we like to do more. We like to be a corporation that is recognisable, approachable and accessible to ouw residents.

NAICS: 53
NAICS Definition: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employees: 302
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EV Initiative Inc.

2108 N St, Sacramento, 95816, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Company Description: EV Initiative is a B2B SaaS business; our technology enables Charge Port Operators (CPOs)—third-party organizations that are creating and maintaining EV Charging Networks—to establish their EV-related businesses. What’s a CPO? The entities grow and maintaining Electric Vehicle (EV) charging networks. CPOs are plenty; utilities, property owners and managers, fleet operators, solar and electrical, quick service restaurants, corporate, hospitality, government. and more. Our mission is to Enable the Next Generation. We provide the platform for CPOs with EV initiative. Our offerings: • Charge Port Management Software (CPMS) - the operating system for EV Charging Networks, we white label for our customers • Point-of-Sale Driver App - white labeled for CPOs • EV Initiative Hardware Shop - EV Charging Stations (EVCS) for CPOs • Additional services: CPO sales and marketing bundles

NAICS: 53
NAICS Definition: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mooiland.jpeg
Mooiland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ev-initiative.jpeg
EV Initiative Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mooiland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EV Initiative Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mooiland in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EV Initiative Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Mooiland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mooiland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EV Initiative Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EV Initiative Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mooiland.jpeg
Mooiland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ev-initiative.jpeg
EV Initiative Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mooiland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EV Initiative Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EV Initiative Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mooiland company.

In the current year, EV Initiative Inc. company and Mooiland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EV Initiative Inc. company nor Mooiland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EV Initiative Inc. company nor Mooiland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EV Initiative Inc. company nor Mooiland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mooiland company nor EV Initiative Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mooiland nor EV Initiative Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

EV Initiative Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Mooiland company.

Mooiland company employs more people globally than EV Initiative Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate and Equipment Rental Services.

Neither Mooiland nor EV Initiative Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mooiland nor EV Initiative Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mooiland nor EV Initiative Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mooiland nor EV Initiative Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mooiland nor EV Initiative Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mooiland nor EV Initiative Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N