Comparison Overview

Montshire Museum of Science

VS

Old Fort Niagara

Montshire Museum of Science

1 Montshire Road, Norwich, 05055, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Montshire Museum of Science in Norwich, Vermont, is a nationally recognized, interactive science center with more than 150 exhibits on nature, technology, astronomy, and the physical sciences. The Montshire's unique, 100-acre riverfront setting includes outdoor exhibits, scenic trails, water features in David Goudy Science Park, and the Hughes Pavilion. Visiting exhibitions, educational programs, and special events are offered throughout the year.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Old Fort Niagara

Po Box 169, Youngstown, New York 14174-0169, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

We feel that thorough preservation, authentic presentation, and high-quality programming future generations can discover their interest and appreciation for our past. Old Fort Niagara has been preserving and presenting the early history of the United States and Canada for over 90 years. Throughout that time we have updated and improved our programming in order to provide the most educational and entertaining experience to our visitors.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/montshire-museum-of-science.jpeg
Montshire Museum of Science
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-fort-niagara.jpeg
Old Fort Niagara
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Montshire Museum of Science
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Old Fort Niagara
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Montshire Museum of Science in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Old Fort Niagara in 2025.

Incident History — Montshire Museum of Science (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Montshire Museum of Science cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Old Fort Niagara (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Old Fort Niagara cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/montshire-museum-of-science.jpeg
Montshire Museum of Science
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-fort-niagara.jpeg
Old Fort Niagara
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Old Fort Niagara company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Montshire Museum of Science company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Old Fort Niagara company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Montshire Museum of Science company.

In the current year, Old Fort Niagara company and Montshire Museum of Science company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Old Fort Niagara company nor Montshire Museum of Science company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Old Fort Niagara company nor Montshire Museum of Science company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Old Fort Niagara company nor Montshire Museum of Science company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Montshire Museum of Science company nor Old Fort Niagara company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Montshire Museum of Science nor Old Fort Niagara holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Montshire Museum of Science company nor Old Fort Niagara company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Montshire Museum of Science company employs more people globally than Old Fort Niagara company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Montshire Museum of Science nor Old Fort Niagara holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Montshire Museum of Science nor Old Fort Niagara holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Montshire Museum of Science nor Old Fort Niagara holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Montshire Museum of Science nor Old Fort Niagara holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Montshire Museum of Science nor Old Fort Niagara holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Montshire Museum of Science nor Old Fort Niagara holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X