Comparison Overview

Monte Nido

VS

Ardent Health

Monte Nido

6100 SW 76th St, None, Miami, Florida, US, 33143
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 700 and 749

Monte Nido is a national mental health provider committed to eradicating eating disorders by offering industry-leading care to adults and adolescents of all genders in a healing environment. Our clinically comprehensive, research-backed treatment in inpatient, residential, day and virtual treatment programs show exceptional outcomes. Our clients get well and stay well six months after treatment. Founded in 1996, our expert staff of eating disorder professionals deliver compassionate care, breakthrough outcomes, and long-term recovery for our clients. Monte Nido operates 50 programs and in 28 states virtually across our family of programs: Monte Nido, Monte Nido Walden, Monte Nido Rosewood, and Monte Nido Clementine.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 879
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Ardent Health

340 Seven Springs Way, Suite 100, Nashville, Tennessee, US, 37027
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 750 and 799

Ardent Health is a leading provider of healthcare in growing mid-sized urban communities across the U.S. With a focus on people and investments in innovative services and technologies, Ardent is passionate about making healthcare better and easier to access. Through its subsidiaries, Ardent delivers care through a system of 30 acute care hospitals and approximately 280 sites of care with over 1,800 employed and affiliated providers across six states. Ardent includes: • 24,000+ team members • 8,000+ nurses • 15,000 lives touched each day • $1 million+ community contributions per day

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 13,838
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monte-nido.jpeg
Monte Nido
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ardenthealth.jpeg
Ardent Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Monte Nido
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ardent Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monte Nido in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ardent Health in 2026.

Incident History — Monte Nido (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monte Nido cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ardent Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ardent Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monte-nido.jpeg
Monte Nido
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ardenthealth.jpeg
Ardent Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ardent Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Monte Nido company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Monte Nido company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ardent Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ardent Health company and Monte Nido company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ardent Health company nor Monte Nido company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Monte Nido company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Ardent Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ardent Health company nor Monte Nido company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Monte Nido company nor Ardent Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Monte Nido nor Ardent Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Monte Nido company nor Ardent Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ardent Health company employs more people globally than Monte Nido company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Monte Nido nor Ardent Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Monte Nido nor Ardent Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Monte Nido nor Ardent Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Monte Nido nor Ardent Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Monte Nido nor Ardent Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Monte Nido nor Ardent Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H