Comparison Overview

Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company

VS

Ampro

Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company

432 Old Vine St, Lexington, Kentucky, 40507, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.monster-color.com

Lynn Imaging’s Monster Color is completely dedicated to large and small format color graphic needs. From concept to completion, Monster Color will work with you to ensure each element and decision of your printing project gives you the highest quality results in a timely manner. Our graphics experts average over twenty years of experience with the company. We carry knowledge of the industry, and insight into customer needs which translate to peace of mind for our clients.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ampro

30 Bunting Lane, Clifton Heights, PA, US, 19018
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amprogo.com

Best. Shirt. Ever. www.amprogo.com In the past 45 years, we estimate that we have printed over 300 million tee shirts, sweatshirts, and jackets. We've also embroidered countless polos, hats, jackets and bags. There is no substitute for experience. Ampro understands how important your logo, branding, and marketing promotions are! We KNOW what it means to put your mark on a piece of apparel to give to your clients or employees. It takes EXPERIENCE to design an apparel item that people will actually wear... and that's where we excel. With the most diverse decorating facility on the East Coast (and one of the largest) we do everything in-house. Screenprinting, Embroidery, Applique, Numbering, Digital printing- we do it all here. Check out our website www.amprogo.com to place your custom orders online, or stop by our showroom in Clifton Heights.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 99
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monster-color-company.jpeg
Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ampro-merch.jpeg
Ampro
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ampro
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ampro in 2025.

Incident History — Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ampro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ampro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monster-color-company.jpeg
Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ampro-merch.jpeg
Ampro
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ampro company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ampro company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company company.

In the current year, Ampro company and Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ampro company nor Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ampro company nor Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ampro company nor Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company company nor Ampro company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company nor Ampro holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company company nor Ampro company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ampro company employs more people globally than Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company nor Ampro holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company nor Ampro holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company nor Ampro holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company nor Ampro holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company nor Ampro holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Monster Color, a Lynn Imaging Company nor Ampro holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References