Comparison Overview

Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc.

VS

ArboNed BV

Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc.

1322 Locust Ave, None, Fairmont, West Virginia, US, 26554
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. (MVA) is located in Marion and Harrison Counties, WV. We are a Federally Qualified Community Health Center accredited by The Joint Commission (TJC) offering adult and pediatric care, as well as ancillary services including: laboratory, radiology, pharmacy, optometry, case management, behavioral health, and social services. Our first established clinic is located in Fairmont, WV, and we have two satellite clinics in Mannington, WV and Shinnston, WV and two school-based wellness centers located at East Fairmont and North Marion High Schools. MVA has been caring for patients since 1958, over 60 years!

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ArboNed BV

Zwarte Woud, Utrecht, 3524 SJ, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

ArboNed maakt werkend MKB in Nederland gezonder en vitaler. Dagelijks staan we klaar voor 61.500 werkgevers en ruim 600.000 werknemers. Wij verlagen verzuim, minimaliseren arbeidsrisico’s en zorgen voor gezonde, gemotiveerde en competente medewerkers. Weten hoe een bedrijf ervoor staat is ons vertrekpunt. Met onze (wettelijk verplichte) analyse-instrumenten geven wij inzicht, adviezen en praktische oplossingen, die aantoonbaar bijdragen aan de gezondheid en vitaliteit van mensen. Want met vitale mensen kunnen ondernemers hun doelen realiseren en hun ambities waarmaken. ArboNed is onderdeel van HumanTotalCare. Kijk voor meer informatie op www.arboned.nl.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 920
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monongahela-valley-association-of-health-centers-inc-.jpeg
Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arboned-bv.jpeg
ArboNed BV
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ArboNed BV
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ArboNed BV in 2025.

Incident History — Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ArboNed BV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ArboNed BV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monongahela-valley-association-of-health-centers-inc-.jpeg
Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arboned-bv.jpeg
ArboNed BV
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ArboNed BV company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ArboNed BV company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. company.

In the current year, ArboNed BV company and Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ArboNed BV company nor Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ArboNed BV company nor Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ArboNed BV company nor Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. company nor ArboNed BV company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. nor ArboNed BV holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. company nor ArboNed BV company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ArboNed BV company employs more people globally than Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. nor ArboNed BV holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. nor ArboNed BV holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. nor ArboNed BV holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. nor ArboNed BV holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. nor ArboNed BV holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Monongahela Valley Association of Health Centers, Inc. nor ArboNed BV holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H