Comparison Overview

Monona Public Library

VS

The Library Corporation

Monona Public Library

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Monona Public Library is proud to provide a wide variety of materials, services, and programs for people of all ages. And there are no library fines at Monona Library! The Monona Public Library is operated by the City of Monona to serve its community and the residents of the South Central Library System (Dane, Columbia, Green, Portage, Adams, Sauk, and Wood Counties). Monona library cards are honored at all of the public libraries and bookmobiles in the South Central Library System, providing access to nearly 3 million items representing 790,000 different titles.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Library Corporation

Research Park, Inwood, WV, 25428-9733, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Tell us your #librarianproblems; we have #TLCsolutions. The Library Corporation (TLC) is a woman-owned, library technology company with industry-leading support & data services. We provide enterprise solutions to public libraries, school libraries & media centers, academic libraries, and special libraries worldwide. About The Library Corporation TLC has operated continuously under the same ownership since 1974 and employs over 200 people dedicated to delivering enterprise software and hardware solutions to libraries worldwide. TLC’s cumulative products are deployed in more than 1,100 organizations, representing over 5,500 locations in North America and worldwide. TLC is certified by the U.S. General Services Administration, Women’s Business Enterprise National Council, and the Women-Owned Small Business Federal Contracting Program. TLC’s Headquarters is based in Inwood, W.Va., and has additional offices in Colorado, Minnesota, and Singapore.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 188
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monona-public-library.jpeg
Monona Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-library-corporation.jpeg
The Library Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Monona Public Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Library Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monona Public Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Library Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Monona Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monona Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Library Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Library Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monona-public-library.jpeg
Monona Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-library-corporation.jpeg
The Library Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Monona Public Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Library Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Library Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Monona Public Library company.

In the current year, The Library Corporation company and Monona Public Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Library Corporation company nor Monona Public Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Library Corporation company nor Monona Public Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Library Corporation company nor Monona Public Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Monona Public Library company nor The Library Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Monona Public Library nor The Library Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Monona Public Library company nor The Library Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Library Corporation company employs more people globally than Monona Public Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Monona Public Library nor The Library Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Monona Public Library nor The Library Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Monona Public Library nor The Library Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Monona Public Library nor The Library Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Monona Public Library nor The Library Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Monona Public Library nor The Library Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H