Comparison Overview

Moneytree

VS

Tata Capital

Moneytree

undefined, Seattle, undefined, undefined, us
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

Moneytree is a family-owned business and a leader in the financial services industry. We’ve been helping customers since 1983 with short-term loans, check cashing services, and more. We operate online and have retail branches located throughout Southern California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, Washington, and British Columbia, Canada. At Moneytree, we believe in our customers. Our goal is to provide an exceptional customer experience during every interaction. This philosophy extends to how we treat our Team Members too. We invest in our Team Members and provide them with rewarding career opportunities in a fun and professional work environment. We also believe in helping our neighbors by giving back to worthy causes in our communities. If you share these values and are looking for a career where you can learn and advance, help others, and make a difference every day, we’re looking for you too! It’s time to explore what working at Moneytree could mean for you. We offer very competitive wages, growth opportunities, work-from-home opportunities, and excellent benefits! Open the door to a great future, and find out more about Moneytree by applying today.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 395
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Tata Capital

Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Tata Capital Limited is a subsidiary of Tata Sons Limited. The Company is registered with the Reserve Bank of India as a Core Investment Company and offers through itself and its subsidiaries fund and fee-based financial services to its customers, under the Tata Capital brand. As a trusted and customer-centric, one-stop financial services provider, Tata Capital caters to the diverse needs of retail, corporate and institutional customers, across various areas of business namely the Commercial Finance, Infrastructure Finance, Cleantech Finance, Wealth Management, Consumer Loans and distribution and marketing of Tata Cards. Tata Capital has over 500+ branches spanning all critical markets in India.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 12,733
Subsidiaries: 73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moneytree.jpeg
Moneytree
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-capital.jpeg
Tata Capital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Moneytree
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tata Capital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Moneytree in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Capital in 2025.

Incident History — Moneytree (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Moneytree cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tata Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moneytree.jpeg
Moneytree
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2016
Type:Breach
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-capital.jpeg
Tata Capital
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing Emails, Spoofed Supplier Communications, WhatsApp Scams, Human Error (Misplaced Trust)
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Reputational Damage, Exploitation of Human Behavior
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Tata Capital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Moneytree company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tata Capital company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Moneytree company.

In the current year, Tata Capital company has reported more cyber incidents than Moneytree company.

Tata Capital company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Moneytree company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Tata Capital company and Moneytree company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Tata Capital company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Moneytree company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Moneytree company nor Tata Capital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Moneytree nor Tata Capital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tata Capital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Moneytree company.

Tata Capital company employs more people globally than Moneytree company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Moneytree nor Tata Capital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Moneytree nor Tata Capital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Moneytree nor Tata Capital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Moneytree nor Tata Capital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Moneytree nor Tata Capital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Moneytree nor Tata Capital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X