Comparison Overview

Moneytree

VS

Capital One

Moneytree

undefined, Seattle, undefined, undefined, us
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

Moneytree is a family-owned business and a leader in the financial services industry. We’ve been helping customers since 1983 with short-term loans, check cashing services, and more. We operate online and have retail branches located throughout Southern California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, Washington, and British Columbia, Canada. At Moneytree, we believe in our customers. Our goal is to provide an exceptional customer experience during every interaction. This philosophy extends to how we treat our Team Members too. We invest in our Team Members and provide them with rewarding career opportunities in a fun and professional work environment. We also believe in helping our neighbors by giving back to worthy causes in our communities. If you share these values and are looking for a career where you can learn and advance, help others, and make a difference every day, we’re looking for you too! It’s time to explore what working at Moneytree could mean for you. We offer very competitive wages, growth opportunities, work-from-home opportunities, and excellent benefits! Open the door to a great future, and find out more about Moneytree by applying today.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 395
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Capital One

1680 Capital One Drive, McLean, Va, US, 22102
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 600 and 649

At Capital One, we're making things better for our customers and associates through innovation and collaboration. We were founded on the belief that everyone deserves financial freedom—and are dedicated to a world where all have equal opportunity to prosper. Banking is in our DNA, but we are so much more than a bank. We always think about what’s next—and how we can bring our customers the tools needed to improve their financial lives. Your ideas, experiences and skills will help make banking better. You’ll be part of a supportive culture while earning amazing benefits. That’s life at Capital One. Capital One is an equal opportunity employer (EOE, including disability/vet) committed to non-discrimination in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws. View our Social Media Community Guidelines https://www.capitalone.com/digital/social-media/

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 81,373
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
11
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moneytree.jpeg
Moneytree
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-one.jpeg
Capital One
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Moneytree
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capital One
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Moneytree in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

Capital One has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Moneytree (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Moneytree cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capital One (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capital One cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moneytree.jpeg
Moneytree
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2016
Type:Breach
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-one.jpeg
Capital One
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Firewall
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Wrongdoing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Moneytree company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capital One company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Capital One company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Moneytree company.

In the current year, Capital One company has reported more cyber incidents than Moneytree company.

Neither Capital One company nor Moneytree company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Capital One company and Moneytree company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Capital One company nor Moneytree company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Moneytree company nor Capital One company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Moneytree nor Capital One holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Capital One company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Moneytree company.

Capital One company employs more people globally than Moneytree company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Moneytree nor Capital One holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Moneytree nor Capital One holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Moneytree nor Capital One holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Moneytree nor Capital One holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Moneytree nor Capital One holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Moneytree nor Capital One holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X